Cyber Dating Violence Prevention Programs in Universal Populations: A Systematic Review

Nuria Galende Pérez · Naiara Ozamiz-Etxebarria · Joana Jaureguizar · Iratxe Redondo

56 citations0/0 files storedPsychology Research and Behavior Management

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Intimate Partner and Family Violence Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment

Abstract

Although the technological revolution of recent decades has produced undeniable advances, it has also generated problems derived from new forms of human communication, especially among the younger population. This is the case with cyber dating violence, a problem that affects between 12% and 56% of young couples, making the need for preventive intervention patently evident. This study attempts to fill a gap in the literature in this field, carrying out a systematic review of universal cyber dating violence prevention programs, analyzing their characteristics and the evidence provided of their effectiveness. Following the PRISMA method, only 3 programs met the inclusion criteria: the DARSI program, the Dat-e Adolescence program and the Brief Incremental Theory of Personality (ITP) adolescent dating violence prevention program. All were reported to be effective, based on different indicators. Given the small body of work published to date and the limitations of the aforementioned programs, future research should aim to design and validate a greater number of programs that serve as tools for addressing this problem in a timely manner, in order to avoid not only the serious consequences it has for victims, but also its escalation towards adulthood.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 56 citations exist upstream.

References

2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement 1979Measuring Intrafamily Conflict and Violence: The Conflict Tactics (CT) Scales 1996The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism.2010Preventing intimate partner and sexual violence against women: taking action and generating evidence 2003Disentangling the “whys” from the “whats” of aggressive behaviour 2001Development and validation of the Conflict in Adolescent Dating Relationships Inventory.1998An evaluation of Safe Dates, an adolescent dating violence prevention program.

Cited by

2023The prevalence of cyber dating abuse among adolescents and emerging adults: A meta-analysis 2022Meta-Analysis of Cyber Intimate Partner Violence Perpetration and Victimization: Different Types and their Associations with Face-to-Face IPV among Men and Women 2021Evaluating Female Experiences of Electronic Dating Violence in Jordan: Motivations, Consequences, and Coping Strategies 2021Dating Violence: Idealization of Love and Romantic Myths in Spanish Adolescents

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.