SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Systematic review and narrative review lead experts to different cancer trial predictions: a randomized trial
9 references·0 citing·41 second hop
Systematic review and narrative review lead experts to different cancer trial predictions: a randomized trial (2020)Systematic review and narrative review le…RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses (2013)RAMESES publication standards…Reducing Overconfidence in the Interval Judgments of Experts (2009)Reducing Overconfidence in th…Of mites and men: reference bias in narrative review articles: a systematic review. (2005)Of mites and men: reference b…Effect of interpretive bias on research evidence (2003)Effect of interpretive bias o…Comparison of systematic and narrative reviews: the example of the atypical antipsychotics (2003)Comparison of systematic and …The Influence of Prior Beliefs on Scientific Judgments of Evidence Quality (1993)The Influence of Prior Belief…The Medical Review Article: State of the Science (1987)The Medical Review Article: S…The base-rate fallacy in probability judgments (1980)The base-rate fallacy in prob…Intuitive theories of events and the effects of base-rate information on prediction. (1977)Intuitive theories of events …Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1975)Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (2009)A practical guide to structured expert elicitation using the IDEA protocol (2017)Expert biases in technology foresight. Why they are a problem and how to mitigate them (2019)Ask the Experts: What Should Be on an IoT Privacy and Security Label? (2020)Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (2021)On the psychology of prediction. (1973)Judged frequency of lethal events. (1978)Conservatism in human information processing (1982)Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. (1986)Volume, Volatility, Price, and Profit When All Traders Are Above Average (1998)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes (1998)Return to Reason (2001)Scientific authorship (2004)Including gaming disorder in the ICD-11: The need to do so from a clinical and public health perspective (2018)The limited prosocial effects of meditation: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2018)A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction (1992)Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews (1994)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Chinese Outbound Tourism Research (2015)The sleep phenotype of Borderline Personality Disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2016)Supply chain sustainability: A tertiary literature review (2019)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)What’s in a mechanism? Development of a key concept in realist evaluation (2015)Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report. (2018)Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews? (2018)Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability (1973)Social Cognition And Social Perception (1987)Explaining the evidence: Tests of the Story Model for juror decision making. (1992)Media Bias and Reputation (2006)Eliciting Expert Knowledge in Conservation Science (2012)The Psychology of Fake News (2021)Systems to rate the strength of scientific evidence. (2002)Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews (2007)Evaluation of the Endorsement of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement on the Quality of Published Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (2013)Are benefits and harms in mammography screening given equal attention in scientific articles? A cross-sectional study (2007)Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (2008)Research synthesis in veterinary science: Narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analysis (2015)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2013RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses1,374 cited
  • 1980The base-rate fallacy in probability judgments1,184 cited
  • 1987The Medical Review Article: State of the Science857 cited
  • 1977Intuitive theories of events and the effects of base-rate information on prediction.503 cited
  • 1993The Influence of Prior Beliefs on Scientific Judgments of Evidence Quality366 cited
  • 2009Reducing Overconfidence in the Interval Judgments of Experts351 cited
  • 2003Effect of interpretive bias on research evidence222 cited
  • 2003Comparison of systematic and narrative reviews: the example of the atypical antipsychotics105 cited
  • 2005Of mites and men: reference bias in narrative review articles: a systematic review.57 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work