SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Moving toward Generalizability? A Scoping Review on Measuring the Impact of Living Labs
16 references·16 citing·40 second hopsampled
Moving toward Generalizability? A Scoping Review on Measuring the Impact of Living Labs (2021)Moving toward Generalizability? A Scoping…Can living labs offer a pathway to support local agri-food sustainability transitions? (2020)Can living labs offer a pathw…Living labs: From scattered initiatives to a global movement (2019)Living labs: From scattered i…The effectiveness of involving users in digital innovation: Measuring the impact of living labs (2018)The effectiveness of involvin…Text Mining Digital Humanities Projects: Assessing Content Analysis Capabilities of Voyant Tools (2018)Text Mining Digital Humanitie…Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)Systematic review or scoping …PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)PRISMA Extension for Scoping …Impacts of urban living labs on sustainability transitions: mechanisms and strategies for systemic change through experimentation (2018)Impacts of urban living labs …A systematic review of living lab literature (2018)A systematic review of living…Urban living labs: governing urban sustainability transitions (2016)Urban living labs: governing …The Impact of Living Lab Methodology on Open Innovation Contributions and Outcomes (2016)The Impact of Living Lab Meth…The effect of network structure on radical innovation in living labs (2016)The effect of network structu…Urban living labs for sustainability and low carbon cities in Europe: towards a research agenda (2015)Urban living labs for sustain…Linking Living Lab Characteristics and Their Outcomes: Towards a Conceptual Framework (2013)Linking Living Lab Characteri…Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic (2012)Interrater reliability: the k…A set of key principles to assess the impact of Living Labs (2012)A set of key principles to as…Transdisciplinary collaboration in environmental research (2005)Transdisciplinary collaborati…A review on the role of living labs in advancing sustainable practices in rural areas: Insights from agriculture, forestry, and agroforestry systems (2025)A review on the role of livin…The role of living labs in cultivating inclusive and responsible innovation in precision agriculture (2024)The role of living labs in cu…Living Labs in science-industry collaborations: Roles, design, and application patterns (2024)Living Labs in science-indust…Labbing for sustainability transformations: Learning about challenges and strategies for impact (2024)Labbing for sustainability tr…A Systematic Review of Living Labs in the Context of Sustainable Development with a Focus on Bioeconomy (2024)A Systematic Review of Living…Using the right words or using the words right? Re-conceptualising living labs for systemic innovation in socio-ecological systems (2023)Using the right words or usin…Reflecting on four Living Labs in the Netherlands and Indonesia: a perspective on performance, public engagement and participation (2023)Reflecting on four Living Lab…Protocol for a systematic review of living labs in agricultural-related systems (2023)Protocol for a systematic rev…Exploring the practice of Labs for sustainable transformation: The challenge of ‘creating impact’ (2023)Exploring the practice of Lab…Enablers, barriers, and future considerations for living lab effectiveness in environmental and agricultural sustainability transitions: a review of studies evaluating living labs (2023)Enablers, barriers, and futur…Agro living Labs: Creating innovative, sustainable, resilient and social inclusive food systems (2023)Agro living Labs: Creating in…Sustainability Transitions and the Contribution of Living Labs: A Framework to Assess Collective Capabilities and Contextual Performance (2022)Sustainability Transitions an…A research agenda for evaluating living labs as an open innovation model for environmental and agricultural sustainability (2022)A research agenda for evaluat…Living Labs Past Achievements, Current Developments, and Future Trajectories (2021)Living Labs Past Achievements…Living Labs for Public Sector Innovation: insights from a European case study (2021)Living Labs for Public Sector…A Scoping Review Examining Governance, Co-Creation, and Social and Ecological Justice in Living Labs Literature (2021)A Scoping Review Examining Go…Case Study Research: Design and Methods (1984)Case Study Research: Design and Methods (1991)Promoting novelty, rigor, and style in energy social science: Towards codes of practice for appropriate methods and research design (2018)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches (1996)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1996)Transdisciplinarity in Corporate Sustainability: Mapping the Field (2013)Becoming Transdisciplinary: The Emergence of the Transdisciplinary Individual (2014)Developing a Conceptual Model of STEAM Teaching Practices (2017)Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention (1962)Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology (2003)Case Study Research (2004)Open innovation and the evaluation of internet-enabled public services in smart cities (2018)How Cities Learn: From Experimentation to Transformation (2021)Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (1994)Public procurement, innovation and industrial policy: Rationales, roles, capabilities and implementation (2019)Transdisciplinary sustainability research in real-world labs: success factors and methods for change (2021)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2020)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2021)Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews (2022)Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning (1991)Living Labs as Open-Innovation Networks (2012)Environmental innovation, knowledge spillovers and policy implications: A systematic review of the economic effects literature (2019)A literature review and integrated framework for the determinants of crowdfunding success (2022)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)Game-based Learning and 21st century skills: A review of recent research (2016)Intercoder Reliability in Qualitative Research: Debates and Practical Guidelines (2020)Student Motivation and Associated Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis From Self-Determination Theory (2021)Technology Innovation Management Review (2012)The mediating role of supply chain collaboration on the relationship between information technology and innovation (2018)Living Labs and user engagement for innovation and sustainability (2020)Co-Creation Dynamics in Urban Living Labs (2018)Urban living laboratories: Conducting the experimental city? (2018)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2018PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation43,318 cited
  • 2012Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic19,799 cited
  • 2018Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach11,351 cited
  • 2015Urban living labs for sustainability and low carbon cities in Europe: towards a research agenda749 cited
  • 2018A systematic review of living lab literature582 cited
  • 2016Urban living labs: governing urban sustainability transitions524 cited
  • 2018Impacts of urban living labs on sustainability transitions: mechanisms and strategies for systemic change through experimentation439 cited
  • 2005Transdisciplinary collaboration in environmental research225 cited
  • 2013Linking Living Lab Characteristics and Their Outcomes: Towards a Conceptual Framework178 cited
  • 2016The Impact of Living Lab Methodology on Open Innovation Contributions and Outcomes140 cited
  • 2012A set of key principles to assess the impact of Living Labs122 cited
  • 2018The effectiveness of involving users in digital innovation: Measuring the impact of living labs119 cited
  • 2016The effect of network structure on radical innovation in living labs84 cited
  • 2018Text Mining Digital Humanities Projects: Assessing Content Analysis Capabilities of Voyant Tools

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

83 cited
  • 2020Can living labs offer a pathway to support local agri-food sustainability transitions?83 cited
  • 2019Living labs: From scattered initiatives to a global movement81 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2022A research agenda for evaluating living labs as an open innovation model for environmental and agricultural sustainability62 cited
    • 2024The role of living labs in cultivating inclusive and responsible innovation in precision agriculture57 cited
    • 2023Exploring the practice of Labs for sustainable transformation: The challenge of ‘creating impact’55 cited
    • 2022Sustainability Transitions and the Contribution of Living Labs: A Framework to Assess Collective Capabilities and Contextual Performance47 cited
    • 2023Enablers, barriers, and future considerations for living lab effectiveness in environmental and agricultural sustainability transitions: a review of studies evaluating living labs46 cited
    • 2024Living Labs in science-industry collaborations: Roles, design, and application patterns30 cited
    • 2021A Scoping Review Examining Governance, Co-Creation, and Social and Ecological Justice in Living Labs Literature27 cited
    • 2023Using the right words or using the words right? Re-conceptualising living labs for systemic innovation in socio-ecological systems24 cited
    • 2023Protocol for a systematic review of living labs in agricultural-related systems19 cited
    • 2021Living Labs Past Achievements, Current Developments, and Future Trajectories19 cited
    • 2024Labbing for sustainability transformations: Learning about challenges and strategies for impact17 cited
    • 2025A review on the role of living labs in advancing sustainable practices in rural areas: Insights from agriculture, forestry, and agroforestry systems13 cited
    • 2023Agro living Labs: Creating innovative, sustainable, resilient and social inclusive food systems12 cited
    • 2021Living Labs for Public Sector Innovation: insights from a European case study12 cited
    • 2024A Systematic Review of Living Labs in the Context of Sustainable Development with a Focus on Bioeconomy10 cited
    • 2023Reflecting on four Living Labs in the Netherlands and Indonesia: a perspective on performance, public engagement and participation10 cited