SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
How to Protect the Credibility of Articles Published in Predatory Journals
16 references·3 citing·38 second hop
How to Protect the Credibility of Articles Published in Predatory Journals (2021)How to Protect the Credibility of Article…The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity (2020)The Hong Kong Principles for …Why do authors publish in predatory journals? (2018)Why do authors publish in pre…The preregistration revolution (2018)The preregistration revolutionPredatory journals: Who publishes in them and why? (2018)Predatory journals: Who publi…What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)What is open peer review? A s…What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)What is open peer review? A s…Stop this waste of people, animals and money (2017)Stop this waste of people, an…Pre-registration in social psychology—A discussion and suggested template (2016)Pre-registration in social ps…False-Positive Psychology (2011)False-Positive PsychologyWhy Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research F…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research F…HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known (1998)HARKing: Hypothesizing After …Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Publication bias in clinical …The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)The file drawer problem and t…The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)The Matthew effect in science…The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew Effect in ScienceThe publish or perish, publish and perish, publish then perish, and now retract and perish cultures in academia (2025)The publish or perish, publis…Investigating academic nurse researchers' knowledge, experience, and attitude toward predatory journals (2024)Investigating academic nurse …Do orthopaedics surgeons have any idea what predatory journals are?:(cross-sectional study) (2024)Do orthopaedics surgeons have…Artifact in behavioral research (1969)The Handbook of Social Psychology (1969)Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2000)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Priorities in Scientific Discovery: A Chapter in the Sociology of Science (1957)Resistance by Scientists to Scientific Discovery (1961)The Scientific Community. (1966)Matthew Effects in Reading: Some Consequences of Individual Differences in the Acquisition of Literacy (1986)Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf's law (2005)The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge (2007)Strong Inference (1964)The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes (1978)Shall we Really do it Again? The Powerful Concept of Replication is Neglected in the Social Sciences (2009)Scientific Utopia (2012)P-curve: A key to the file-drawer. (2013)The Logic of Scientific Discovery (2013)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)Biased evaluation and persistence in gambling. (1983)The case for motivated reasoning. (1990)The New Statistics (2013)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1975)Thinking, Fast and Slow (2011)Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015 (2018)Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings (2018)Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science (2021)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)Methodology over metrics: current scientific standards are a disservice to patients and society (2021)Prevalence of questionable research practices, research misconduct and their potential explanatory factors: A survey among academic researchers in The Netherlands (2022)A typology of validity: content, face, convergent, discriminant, nomological and predictive validity (2024)Little Science, Big Science (1963)A Nonparametric "Trim and Fill" Method of Accounting for Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis (2000)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. (2006)The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False10,471 cited
  • 1979The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.9,043 cited
  • 1968The Matthew Effect in Science6,700 cited
  • 2011False-Positive Psychology6,561 cited
  • 1968The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered.4,791 cited
  • 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False4,702 cited
  • 1991Publication bias in clinical research3,110 cited
  • 1998HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known1,988 cited
  • 2018The preregistration revolution1,972 cited
  • 2020The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity545 cited
  • 2017What is open peer review? A systematic review453 cited
  • 2016Pre-registration in social psychology—A discussion and suggested template439 cited
  • 2017Stop this waste of people, animals and money284 cited
  • 2018Why do authors publish in predatory journals?257 cited
  • 2018Predatory journals: Who publishes in them and why?245 cited
  • 2017What is open peer review? A systematic review

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

232 cited

Cited by

  • 2025The publish or perish, publish and perish, publish then perish, and now retract and perish cultures in academia15 cited
  • 2024Investigating academic nurse researchers' knowledge, experience, and attitude toward predatory journals11 cited
  • 2024Do orthopaedics surgeons have any idea what predatory journals are?:(cross-sectional study)5 cited