Are founder CEOs more overconfident than professional CEOs? Evidence from S&P 1500 companies

Joon Mahn Lee · Byoung‐Hyoun Hwang · Hailiang Chen

211 citations0/0 files storedStrategic Management Journal

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Corporate Finance and Governance Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences Family Business Performance and Succession

Abstract

Research summary : We provide evidence that founder chief executive officers (CEOs) of large S&P 1500 companies are more overconfident than their nonfounder counterparts (“professional CEOs”). We measure overconfidence via tone of CEO tweets, tone of CEO statements during earnings conference calls, management earnings forecasts, and CEO option‐exercise behavior. Compared with professional CEOs, founder CEOs use more optimistic language on Twitter and during earnings conference calls. In addition, founder CEOs are more likely to issue earnings forecasts that are too high; they are also more likely to perceive their firms to be undervalued, as implied by their option‐exercise behavior. We provide evidence that, to date, investors appear unaware of this “overconfidence bias” among founders. Managerial summary : This article helps to explain why firms managed by founder chief executive officers (CEOs) behave differently from those managed by professional CEOs. We study a sample of S&P 1500 firms and find strong evidence that founder CEOs are more overconfident than professional CEOs. To date, investors appear unaware of this overconfidence bias among founders. Our study should help firm stakeholders, including investors, employees, suppliers, and customers, put the statements and actions of founder CEOs in perspective. Our study should also help members of corporate boards make more informed decisions about whether to retain (or bring back) founder CEOs or hire professional CEOs . Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 211 citations exist upstream.

References

1992The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns 2021Econometric Analysis of Panel Data 2011When Is a Liability Not a Liability? Textual Analysis, Dictionaries, and 10‐Ks 2001Boys will be Boys: Gender, Overconfidence, and Common Stock Investment 2007Giving Content to Investor Sentiment: The Role of Media in the Stock Market 1987THE PEOPLE MAKE THE PLACE 2005How do family ownership, control and management affect firm value?1986The Hubris Hypothesis of Corporate Takeovers

Cited by

2019CEO overconfidence and CSR decoupling 2017Analyzing Analyst Research: A Review of Past Coverage and Recommendations for Future Research 2019Bridging Methodological Divides Between Macro- and Microresearch: Endogeneity and Methods for Panel Data 2018CEO Hubris and Firm Pollution: State and Market Contingencies in a Transitional Economy 2020Keep Your Eye on the Ball or on the Field? Exploring the Performance Implications of Executive Strategic Attention

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.