SZodixStudyAcademic Library
DashboardShelvesOpen accessMy libraryInboxNotesWriteLearnAlerts
More
Ask your libraryNotificationsQuick citeReview
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Open science and reform practices in organizational behavior research over time (2011 to 2019)
8 references·6 citing·41 second hop
Open science and reform practices in organizational behavior research over time (2011 to 2019) (2021)Open science and reform practices in orga…Calibrating the Scientific Ecosystem Through Meta-Research (2019)Calibrating the Scientific Ec…Redefine statistical significance (2017)Redefine statistical signific…Quality Uncertainty Erodes Trust in Science (2017)Quality Uncertainty Erodes Tr…Psychology's Renaissance (2017)Psychology's RenaissancePromoting an open research culture (2015)Promoting an open research cu…A Short (Personal) Future History of Revolution 2.0 (2015)A Short (Personal) Future His…The N-Pact Factor: Evaluating the Quality of Empirical Journals with Respect to Sample Size and Statistical Power (2014)The N-Pact Factor: Evaluating…Business Not as Usual (2013)Business Not as UsualValidity and Transparency in Quantifying Open-Ended Data (2024)Validity and Transparency in …How well are open science practices implemented in industrial and organizational psychology and management? (2023)How well are open science pra…The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive (2022)The Pandemic as a Portal: Rei…Sixty years of studying the sacred: Auditing and advancing the psychology of religion and spirituality. (2022)Sixty years of studying the s…Norms for Behavioral Change (NBC) model: How injunctive norms and enforcement shift descriptive norms in science (2022)Norms for Behavioral Change (…Dissecting the tension of open science standards implementation in management and organization journals (2021)Dissecting the tension of ope…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)False-Positive Psychology (2011)Color and psychological functioning: a review of theoretical and empirical work (2015)Implications of the Credibility Revolution for Productivity, Creativity, and Progress (2018)Gender differences in associations between digital media use and psychological well‐being: Evidence from three large datasets (2020)Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (2011)The New Statistics (2013)Gender (mis)measurement: Guidelines for respecting gender diversity in psychological research (2019)Recommendations for Increasing the Transparency of Analysis of Preexisting Data Sets (2019)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)The weirdest people in the world? (2010)Robust Modeling in Cognitive Science (2019)The Value of Preregistration for Psychological Science: A Conceptual Analysis (2019)Replication is important for educational psychology: Recent developments and key issues (2021)The Market for "Lemons": Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism (1970)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)Attitudes Towards Science (2017)The replicability crisis and public trust in psychological science (2018)Video game play is positively correlated with well-being (2021)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2000)A problem in theory (2019)What can be learned from growth mindset controversies? (2020)Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science (2021)Reproducibility in Science (2014)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015 (2018)Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings (2018)How Many Participants Do We Have to Include in Properly Powered Experiments? A Tutorial of Power Analysis with Reference Tables (2019)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)How often do leading biomedical journals use statistical experts to evaluate statistical methods? The results of a survey (2020)Reporting of methodological studies in health research: a protocol for the development of the MethodologIcal STudy reportIng Checklist (MISTIC) (2020)A meta-review of transparency and reproducibility-related reporting practices in published meta-analyses on clinical psychological interventions (2000–2020) (2021)The case for motivated reasoning. (1990)Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory, and Antiracist Politics [1989] (2018)Cognitive scripts and narrative identity are shaped by structures of power (2023)Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report. (2018)How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines (2021)A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2017Redefine statistical significance2,771 cited
  • 2015Promoting an open research culture2,686 cited
  • 2017Psychology's Renaissance548 cited
  • 2014The N-Pact Factor: Evaluating the Quality of Empirical Journals with Respect to Sample Size and Statistical Power405 cited
  • 2013Business Not as Usual257 cited
  • 2015A Short (Personal) Future History of Revolution 2.0213 cited
  • 2017Quality Uncertainty Erodes Trust in Science106 cited
  • 2019Calibrating the Scientific Ecosystem Through Meta-Research97 cited

Cited by

  • 2022The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive69 cited
  • 2022Sixty years of studying the sacred: Auditing and advancing the psychology of religion and spirituality.21 cited
  • 2022Norms for Behavioral Change (NBC) model: How injunctive norms and enforcement shift descriptive norms in science18 cited
  • 2024Validity and Transparency in Quantifying Open-Ended Data16 cited
  • 2023How well are open science practices implemented in industrial and organizational psychology and management?15 cited
  • 2021Dissecting the tension of open science standards implementation in management and organization journals12 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work