Citation map · Study

How do consumers respond to “sin taxes”? New evidence from a tax on sugary drinks

16 references·2 citing·36 second hop

this work references cited by second hop

References

2009Salience and Taxation: Theory and Evidence2,907 cited
1999High Wage Workers and High Wage Firms2,654 cited
2016Beverage purchases from stores in Mexico under the excise tax on sugar sweetened beverages: observational study827 cited
2019Impact of sugar‐sweetened beverage taxes on purchases and dietary intake: Systematic review and meta‐analysis486 cited
2016Impact of the Berkeley Excise Tax on Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Consumption465 cited
2017Changes in prices, sales, consumer spending, and beverage consumption one year after a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages in Berkeley, California, US: A before-and-after study412 cited
2019Association of a Beverage Tax on Sugar-Sweetened and Artificially Sweetened Beverages With Changes in Beverage Prices and Sales at Chain Retailers in a Large Urban Setting240 cited
2019The Economics of Taxes on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages: A Review of the Effects on Prices, Sales, Cross-Border Shopping, and Consumption207 cited
2016The impact of a ‘soda tax’ on prices: evidence from French micro data183 cited
2016Beverages Sales in Mexico before and after Implementation of a Sugar Sweetened Beverage Tax175 cited
2016The Impact of a Tax on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages on Health and Health Care Costs: A Modelling Study169 cited
2016Taxes on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages to Reduce Overweight and Obesity in Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review167 cited
2017Modelled health benefits of a sugar-sweetened beverage tax across different socioeconomic groups in Australia: A cost-effectiveness and equity analysis

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

References

Cited by