SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Training early career researchers to use meta-research to improve science: A participant-guided “learn by doing” approach
7 references·3 citing·41 second hop
Training early career researchers to use meta-research to improve science: A participant-guided “learn by doing” approach (2021)Training early career researchers to use …Creating clear and informative image-based figures for scientific publications (2021)Creating clear and informativ…Why we need to report more than 'Data were Analyzed by t-tests or ANOVA' (2018)Why we need to report more th…Meta-research: Why research on research matters (2018)Meta-research: Why research o…Transparent reporting of research results in eLife (2016)Transparent reporting of rese…Transparency Is the Key to Quality (2015)Transparency Is the Key to Qu…The Need for Randomization in Animal Trials: An Overview of Systematic Reviews (2014)The Need for Randomization in…Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)Power failure: why small samp…Shortcut citations in the methods section: Frequency, problems, and strategies for responsible reuse (2024)Shortcut citations in the met…Taking shortcuts: Great for travel, but not for reproducible methods sections (2022)Taking shortcuts: Great for t…Finding the best fit for improving reproducibility: reflections from the QUEST Center for Responsible Research (2022)Finding the best fit for impr…Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Evidence of Experimental Bias in the Life Sciences: Why We Need Blind Data Recording (2015)How credible are the study results? Evaluating and applying internal validity tools to literature-based assessments of environmental health hazards (2016)RandoMice, a novel, user-friendly randomization tool in animal research (2020)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences (2007)Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (2011)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018)Sample Size Justification (2022)Replicates and repeats—what is the difference and is it significant? (2012)Towards wide-scale adoption of open science practices: The role of open science communities (2021)Blind spots on western blots: Assessment of common problems in western blot figures and methods reporting with recommendations to improve them (2022)Announcement: Reducing our irreproducibility (2013)How to Make More Published Research True (2014)Promoting an open research culture (2015)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility (2016)The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)Research Weaving: Visualizing the Future of Research Synthesis (2018)Examining overlap of included studies in meta‐reviews: Guidance for using the corrected covered area index (2019)How can we ensure visibility and diversity in research contributions? How the Contributor Role Taxonomy (CRediT) is helping the shift from authorship to contributorship (2019)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs (2013)Improving the trustworthiness, usefulness, and ethics of biomedical research through an innovative and comprehensive institutional initiative (2020)How to Write Statistical Analysis Section in Medical Research (2022)Estimating the Replicability of Sports and Exercise Science Research (2025)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Reproducible image handling and analysis (2021)Eleven strategies for making reproducible research and open science training the norm at research institutions (2023)Ten simple rules for designing graphical abstracts (2024)Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions (2011)The secret lives of experiments: Methods reporting in the fMRI literature (2012)Jupyter Notebooks – a publishing format for reproducible computational workflows (2016)Positioning and Power in Academic Publishing: Players, Agents and Agendas (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2013Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience7,634 cited
  • 2018Meta-research: Why research on research matters317 cited
  • 2014The Need for Randomization in Animal Trials: An Overview of Systematic Reviews294 cited
  • 2015Transparency Is the Key to Quality114 cited
  • 2018Why we need to report more than 'Data were Analyzed by t-tests or ANOVA'76 cited
  • 2021Creating clear and informative image-based figures for scientific publications75 cited
  • 2016Transparent reporting of research results in eLife13 cited

Cited by

  • 2022Finding the best fit for improving reproducibility: reflections from the QUEST Center for Responsible Research9 cited
  • 2024Shortcut citations in the methods section: Frequency, problems, and strategies for responsible reuse8 cited
  • 2022Taking shortcuts: Great for travel, but not for reproducible methods sections7 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work