Beyond money: Nonmonetary prosociality across adulthood.

Ryan Best · Alexandra M. Freund

20 citations0/0 files storedPsychology and Aging

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Aging and Gerontology Research Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies

Abstract

Empirical evidence suggests that self-reported prosociality and donations increase with age. The majority of this research was conducted using monetary donations as outcome measures. However, on average older adults hold a significant advantage in financial and material assets compared to younger adults, effectively lowering the subjective cost of small monetary donations. Are older adults also more prosocial when donating a nonmonetary resource that is of equal or even higher value for them compared to younger age groups? A first study (N = 160, 20-74 years) combined data from self-report measures, affective responses, and hypothetical donation decisions to compute a single prosociality factor. Conceptually replicating findings from Hubbard, Harbaugh, Srivastava, Degras, and Mayr (2016) on monetary donations, results suggest that nonmonetary prosociality also increases with age. However, these differences depended on the domain of the donation. Data from two further behavioral studies (Study 2: N = 156, 18-89 years; Study 3: N = 342, 19-88 years) that were analyzed using Bayesian statistics provided evidence that older adults are not more prosocial than younger and middle-aged adults when donating a small amount of their time (in service of a donation to charity). In summary, the three studies suggest that older adults are not consistently more likely to behave prosocially than younger or middle-aged adults in nonmonetary domains. These findings point to the importance of moving research on prosociality and aging beyond financial donations and further explore the role of resources and perceived costs of prosociality. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 20 citations exist upstream.

References

1994Measuring emotion: The self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential 2010Having less, giving more: The influence of social class on prosocial behavior.2004Transformations in the Couplings Among Intellectual Abilities and Constituent Cognitive Processes Across the Life Span 1993Generativity among young, midlife, and older adults.2011Greater emotional empathy and prosocial behavior in late life.1999Aging, Motor Control, and the Performance of Computer Mouse Tasks 2013Aging, Empathy, and Prosociality 2013Age-related differences in altruism across adulthood: Making personal financial gain versus contributing to the public good.

Cited by

2022Age Differences in Prosocial Behavior Depend on Effort Costs 2022Do older adults make more risky decisions in the Hungry Donkey Task or in the Iowa Gambling Task?2023The Concept of Prosociality in Later Life and Its Dimensions: A Scoping Review 2026Detecting age differences in prosociality using a newly developed picture-based measure

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.