Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

A new intelligent MCDM model for HCW management: The integrated BWM–MABAC model based on D numbers

16 references·13 citing·43 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2003Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS5,018 cited
2014The selection of transport and handling resources in logistics centers using Multi-Attributive Border Approximation area Comparison (MABAC)1,150 cited
2020Sustainable supplier selection: A novel integrated fuzzy best worst method (F-BWM) and fuzzy CoCoSo with Bonferroni (CoCoSo’B) multi-criteria model423 cited
2014A state-of-the-art survey on the influence of normalization techniques in ranking: Improving the materials selection process in engineering design341 cited
2016Pythagorean Fuzzy Choquet Integral Based MABAC Method for Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making320 cited
2013The use of multi-criteria decision analysis to tackle waste management problems: a literature review236 cited
2018A Sensitivity analysis in MCDM problems: A statistical approach207 cited
2014Evaluating health-care waste treatment technologies using a hybrid multi-criteria decision making model199 cited
2019MABAC method for multiple attribute group decision making under q-rung orthopair fuzzy environment187 cited
2018Failure mode and effects analysis based on D numbers and TOPSIS184 cited
2018A novel multi-criteria decision making method for assessing health-care waste treatment technologies based on D numbers178 cited
2013Assessment of health-care waste disposal methods using a VIKOR-based fuzzy multi-criteria decision making method175 cited
2018

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) in health care: a systematic review of the main characteristics and methodological steps

165 cited

2013Environmental impact assessment based on D numbers152 cited

2006Classification Using Belief Functions: Relationship Between Case-Based and Model-Based Approaches143 cited

2017D-AHP method with different credibility of information140 cited

Cited by

2022Novel Fermatean Fuzzy Bonferroni Mean aggregation operators for selecting optimal health care waste treatment technology83 cited
2022Market Assessment of Pear Varieties in Serbia Using Fuzzy CRADIS and CRITIC Methods81 cited
2022A novel group BWM approach to evaluate the implementation criteria of blockchain technology in the automotive industry supply chain76 cited
2022An integrated multi-criteria decision-making and multi-objective optimization framework for green supplier evaluation and optimal order allocation under uncertainty74 cited
2022A two-stage framework for site selection of underground pumped storage power stations using abandoned coal mines based on multi-criteria decision-making method: An empirical study in China56 cited
2023Selection of healthcare waste management treatment using fuzzy rough numbers and Aczel–Alsina Function50 cited
2022A framework for the fusion of non-exclusive and incomplete information on the basis of D number theory49 cited
2023A consensus-based Fermatean fuzzy WASPAS methodology for selection of healthcare waste treatment technology selection46 cited
2023A Novel Axial-Distance-Based Aggregated Measurement (ADAM) Method for the Evaluation of Agri-Food Circular-Economy-Based Business Models45 cited
2021An integrated framework for new sustainable waste-to-energy technology selection and risk assessment: An R-TODIM-R-MULTIMOOSRAL approach43 cited
2023Resilient sustainable investment in digital education technology: A stakeholder-centric decision support model under uncertainty41 cited
2021Assessment of a failure prediction model in the European energy sector: A multicriteria discrimination approach with a PROMETHEE based classification23 cited
2022Assessing employees’ job motivation using BWM method and fuzzy goal programming: a case study of a petrochemical company3 cited