SZodixStudyAcademic Library
DashboardShelvesOpen accessMy libraryInboxNotesWriteLearnAlerts
More
Ask your libraryNotificationsQuick citeReview
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Both Questionable and Open Research Practices Are Prevalent in Education Research
16 references·13 citing·34 second hop
Both Questionable and Open Research Practices Are Prevalent in Education Research (2021)Both Questionable and Open Research Pract…Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond (2019)Open science challenges, bene…Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings (2018)Many Labs 2: Investigating Va…Implications of the Credibility Revolution for Productivity, Creativity, and Progress (2018)Implications of the Credibili…Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015 (2018)Evaluating the replicability …Promoting an open research culture (2015)Promoting an open research cu…Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Estimating the reproducibilit…Facts Are More Important Than Novelty (2014)Facts Are More Important Than…Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs (2013)Calculating and reporting eff…Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (2012)Measuring the Prevalence of Q…Is the Replicability Crisis Overblown? Three Arguments Examined (2012)Is the Replicability Crisis O…Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries (2011)Negative results are disappea…False-Positive Psychology (2011)False-Positive PsychologyBelieve it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets? (2011)Believe it or not: how much c…HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known (1998)HARKing: Hypothesizing After …Getting to Scale with Good Educational Practice (1996)Getting to Scale with Good Ed…The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)The file drawer problem and t…The benefits of preregistration and Registered Reports (2024)The benefits of preregistrati…Special Education Researchers’ Knowledge, Attitudes, and Reported Use of Open Practices (2024)Special Education Researchers…Is something rotten in the state of Denmark? Cross-national evidence for widespread involvement but not systematic use of questionable research practices across all fields of research (2024)Is something rotten in the st…Open Science Standards at Journals that Inform Evidence-Based Policy (2023)Open Science Standards at Jou…On the frequency, prevalence, and perceived severity of questionable research practices (2023)On the frequency, prevalence,…A Targeted Review of Open Practices in Special Education Publications (2023)A Targeted Review of Open Pra…Determining an Evidence Base for Particular Fields of Educational Practice: A Systematic Review of Meta-Analyses on Effective Mathematics and Science Teaching (2022)Determining an Evidence Base …Questionable Research Practices and Open Science in Quantitative Criminology (2021)Questionable Research Practic…Questionable and Open Research Practices: Attitudes and Perceptions among Quantitative Communication Researchers (2021)Questionable and Open Researc…Preregistration and registered reports (2021)Preregistration and registere…Study Preregistration: An Evaluation of a Method for Transparent Reporting (2020)Study Preregistration: An Eva…Replication crisis or an opportunity to improve scientific production? (2020)Replication crisis or an oppo…The Value of Preregistration for Psychological Science: A Conceptual Analysis (2019)The Value of Preregistration …Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)Estimating Psychological Networks and their Accuracy: A Tutorial Paper (2016)Redefine statistical significance (2017)A tutorial on regularized partial correlation networks. (2018)Artifact in behavioral research (1969)The Handbook of Social Psychology (1969)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2000)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)Why Most Discovered True Associations Are Inflated (2008)Scientific Utopia (2012)Recommendations for Increasing Replicability in Psychology (2013)The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science (2015)The case for motivated reasoning. (1990)An Open, Large-Scale, Collaborative Effort to Estimate the Reproducibility of Psychological Science (2012)Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science (2021)Strong Inference (1964)The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes (1978)Shall we Really do it Again? The Powerful Concept of Replication is Neglected in the Social Sciences (2009)P-curve: A key to the file-drawer. (2013)The Logic of Scientific Discovery (2013)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (2009)Mini Meta‐Analysis of Your Own Studies: Some Arguments on Why and a Primer on How (2016)How Many Participants Do We Have to Include in Properly Powered Experiments? A Tutorial of Power Analysis with Reference Tables (2019)Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (2021)Biased evaluation and persistence in gambling. (1983)The New Statistics (2013)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018)Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis (2014)The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2013Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs10,259 cited
  • 1979The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.9,043 cited
  • 2015Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science8,516 cited
  • 2011False-Positive Psychology6,561 cited
  • 2015Promoting an open research culture2,686 cited
  • 2012Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling2,240 cited
  • 1998HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known1,988 cited
  • 2011Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets?1,885 cited
  • 2018Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 20151,519 cited
  • 2011Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries1,215 cited
  • 1996Getting to Scale with Good Educational Practice1,066 cited
  • 2018Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings944 cited
  • 2012Is the Replicability Crisis Overblown? Three Arguments Examined695 cited
  • 2014Facts Are More Important Than Novelty609 cited
  • 2019Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

605 cited
  • 2018Implications of the Credibility Revolution for Productivity, Creativity, and Progress361 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2019The Value of Preregistration for Psychological Science: A Conceptual Analysis128 cited
    • 2020Study Preregistration: An Evaluation of a Method for Transparent Reporting73 cited
    • 2024The benefits of preregistration and Registered Reports63 cited
    • 2023On the frequency, prevalence, and perceived severity of questionable research practices63 cited
    • 2021Questionable and Open Research Practices: Attitudes and Perceptions among Quantitative Communication Researchers61 cited
    • 2021Questionable Research Practices and Open Science in Quantitative Criminology50 cited
    • 2020Replication crisis or an opportunity to improve scientific production?44 cited
    • 2021Preregistration and registered reports30 cited
    • 2024Is something rotten in the state of Denmark? Cross-national evidence for widespread involvement but not systematic use of questionable research practices across all fields of research30 cited
    • 2024Special Education Researchers’ Knowledge, Attitudes, and Reported Use of Open Practices17 cited
    • 2022Determining an Evidence Base for Particular Fields of Educational Practice: A Systematic Review of Meta-Analyses on Effective Mathematics and Science Teaching16 cited
    • 2023A Targeted Review of Open Practices in Special Education Publications14 cited
    • 2023Open Science Standards at Journals that Inform Evidence-Based Policy12 cited