SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Leonardo da Vinci, preregistration and the Architecture of Science: Towards a More Open and Transparent Research Culture
16 references·2 citing·48 second hop
Leonardo da Vinci, preregistration and the Architecture of Science: Towards a More Open and Transparent Research Culture (2021)Leonardo da Vinci, preregistration and th…An Excess of Positive Results: Comparing the Standard Psychology Literature With Registered Reports (2021)An Excess of Positive Results…Research priorities for the COVID‐19 pandemic and beyond: A call to action for psychological science (2020)Research priorities for the C…Publishing volumes in major databases related to Covid-19 (2020)Publishing volumes in major d…Special section on well-being in academic employees. (2019)Special section on well-being…Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond (2019)Open science challenges, bene…Mapping the universe of registered reports (2018)Mapping the universe of regis…A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)A manifesto for reproducible …Registered Reports: Realigning incentives in scientific publishing (2015)Registered Reports: Realignin…Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references (2015)Growth rates of modern scienc…Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Estimating the reproducibilit…Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Better reporting of intervent…Scientific Utopia (2012)Scientific UtopiaWhy psychologists must change the way they analyze their data: The case of psi: Comment on Bem (2011). (2011)Why psychologists must change…False-Positive Psychology (2011)False-Positive PsychologyWhy most published research findings are false (2008)Why most published research f…HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known (1998)HARKing: Hypothesizing After …Pre-registration as behaviour: developing an evidence-based intervention specification to increase pre-registration uptake by researchers using the Behaviour Change Wheel (2022)Pre-registration as behaviour…Assessing Open Science practices in physical activity behaviour change intervention evaluations (2022)Assessing Open Science practi…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs (2013)Estimating Psychological Networks and their Accuracy: A Tutorial Paper (2016)Redefine statistical significance (2017)A tutorial on regularized partial correlation networks. (2018)Networks of Scientific Papers (1965)Scientific peer review (2011)The natural selection of bad science (2016)An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews (2021)Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time (2023)Strong Inference (1964)The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes (1978)Shall we Really do it Again? The Powerful Concept of Replication is Neglected in the Social Sciences (2009)P-curve: A key to the file-drawer. (2013)The Logic of Scientific Discovery (2013)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials (2016)CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials (2016)CARE guidelines for case reports: explanation and elaboration document (2017)Biased evaluation and persistence in gambling. (1983)The case for motivated reasoning. (1990)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)The New Statistics (2013)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Bioconda: sustainable and comprehensive software distribution for the life sciences (2018)The preregistration revolution (2018)Sustainable data analysis with Snakemake (2021)1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility (2016)Jupyter Notebooks – a publishing format for reproducible computational workflows (2016)The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity (2020)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension (2021)The past, present and future of Registered Reports (2021)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)A power primer. (1992)Beyond Power Calculations (2014)The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science (2015)Choosing Prediction Over Explanation in Psychology: Lessons From Machine Learning (2017)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)Modelling science trustworthiness under publish or perish pressure (2018)Anomalies and False Rejections (2020)Responsible Conduct of Research (2022)Replications in Psychology Research (2012)Recommendations for Increasing Replicability in Psychology (2013)Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2014Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide10,521 cited
  • 2015Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science8,516 cited
  • 2011False-Positive Psychology6,561 cited
  • 2017A manifesto for reproducible science3,368 cited
  • 1998HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known1,988 cited
  • 2015Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references1,570 cited
  • 2012Scientific Utopia1,301 cited
  • 2011Why psychologists must change the way they analyze their data: The case of psi: Comment on Bem (2011).977 cited
  • 2019Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond605 cited
  • 2008Why most published research findings are false423 cited
  • 2021An Excess of Positive Results: Comparing the Standard Psychology Literature With Registered Reports372 cited
  • 2020Research priorities for the COVID‐19 pandemic and beyond: A call to action for psychological science210 cited
  • 2015Registered Reports: Realigning incentives in scientific publishing173 cited
  • 2018Mapping the universe of registered reports147 cited
  • 2020Publishing volumes in major databases related to Covid-19

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

140 cited
  • 2019Special section on well-being in academic employees.103 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2022Pre-registration as behaviour: developing an evidence-based intervention specification to increase pre-registration uptake by researchers using the Behaviour Change Wheel16 cited
    • 2022Assessing Open Science practices in physical activity behaviour change intervention evaluations15 cited