Political Identity Over Personal Impact: Early U.S. Reactions to the COVID-19 Pandemic

Robert N. Collins · David R. Mandel · Sarah S. Schywiola

46 citations0/0 files storedFrontiers in Psychology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Communication and COVID-19 Impact Electoral Systems and Political Participation COVID-19 and Mental Health

Abstract

= 6,383) survey (Pew Research and Ipsos W64) of Americans was analyzed to investigate the effects of both political identity (i.e., Democrat or Republican) and personal impact (i.e., whether they suffered job or income loss) on individuals' reactions to the COVID-19 pandemic. Results show that political identity and personal impact influenced the American public's attitudes about and response to COVID-19. Consistent with prior research, political identity exerted a strong influence on self-reports of emotional distress, threat perception, discomfort with exposure, support for restrictions, and perception of under/overreaction by individuals and institutions. The difference between Democrats and Republican responses were consistent with their normative value differences and with the contemporary partisan messaging. Personal impact exerted a comparatively weaker influence on reported emotional distress and threat perception. Both factors had a weak influence on appraisal of individual and government responses. The dominating influence of political identity carried over into the bivariate relations among these self-reported attitudes and responses. In particular, the appraisal of government response divided along party lines, tied to opposing views of whether there has been over- or under-reaction to the pandemic. The dominance of political identity has important implications for crisis management and reflects the influence of normative value differences between the parties, partisan messaging on the pandemic, and polarization in American politics.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 46 citations exist upstream.

References

2013Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 2012lavaan : An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling 1973Dilemmas in a general theory of planning 2002Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance 2000An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict 2007Sensitivity of Goodness of Fit Indexes to Lack of Measurement Invariance 1990The case for motivated reasoning.2003Political conservatism as motivated social cognition.

Cited by

2021Facing the pandemic with trust in science 2021The interplay between partisanship, forecasted COVID-19 deaths, and support for preventive policies 2022Inside the ‘black box’ of COVID-19 vaccination beliefs: Revealing the relative importance of public confidence and news consumption habits 2023Selling hope versus hate: the impact of partisan social media messaging on social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic 2022Ai journalists and reduction of perceived hostile media bias: Replication and extension considering news organization cues.

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.