SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Machine learning for identifying relevant publications in updates of systematic reviews of diagnostic test studies
10 references·0 citing·38 second hop
Machine learning for identifying relevant publications in updates of systematic reviews of diagnostic test studies (2021)Machine learning for identifying relevant…Machine learning for identifying Randomized Controlled Trials: An evaluation and practitioner's guide (2018)Machine learning for identify…A review of recent publication trends from top publishing countries (2018)A review of recent publicatio…Living systematic reviews: 2. Combining human and machine effort (2017)Living systematic reviews: 2.…Living systematic review: 1. Introduction—the why, what, when, and how (2017)Living systematic review: 1. …Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches (2015)Using text mining for study i…Erratum to: Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches (2015)Erratum to: Using text mining…Living Systematic Reviews: An Emerging Opportunity to Narrow the Evidence-Practice Gap (2014)Living Systematic Reviews: An…Reporting quality of diagnostic accuracy studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis of investigations on adherence to STARD (2013)Reporting quality of diagnost…The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Repo…Encyclopedia of Medical Decision Making (2009)Encyclopedia of Medical Decis…Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT (1986)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: Some Improvements after 10 Years of STARD (2014)Synthesizing Evidence from Diagnostic Accuracy TEsts : the SEDATE guideline (2015)Uniformity in measuring adherence to reporting guidelines: the example of TRIPOD for assessing completeness of reporting of prediction model studies (2019)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Meeting the review family: exploring review types and associated information retrieval requirements (2019)Systematic Reviews in Educational Research: Methodology, Perspectives and Application (2019)Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews (1994)Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? (2010)An Introduction to Systematic Reviews (2013)Evidence & Gap Maps: A tool for promoting evidence informed policy and strategic research agendas (2016)The value of a second reviewer for study selection in systematic reviews (2019)Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2010)Machine learning reduced workload with minimal risk of missing studies: development and evaluation of a randomized controlled trial classifier for Cochrane Reviews (2020)A declaração PRISMA 2020: diretriz atualizada para relatar revisões sistemáticas (2022)Artificial intelligence for literature reviews: opportunities and challenges (2024)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records and counting (2018)Comparison of mental health symptoms before and during the covid-19 pandemic: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis of 134 cohorts (2023)Relative Citation Impact of Various Study Designs in the Health Sciences (2005)‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics (2015)The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)Protocol registration issues of systematic review and meta-analysis studies: a survey of global researchers (2020)Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews (2023)metaumbrella: the first comprehensive suite to perform data analysis in umbrella reviews with stratification of the evidence (2023)Artificial intelligence and the conduct of literature reviews (2021)How to conduct a meta-analysis in eight steps: a practical guide (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Searching for and selecting studies (2019)Single screening versus conventional double screening for study selection in systematic reviews: a methodological systematic review (2019)Toward systematic review automation: a practical guide to using machine learning tools in research synthesis (2019)Is guilt ‘likely’ or ‘not certain’? (2010)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration28,094 cited
  • 2015Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches680 cited
  • 2017Living systematic review: 1. Introduction—the why, what, when, and how652 cited
  • 2014Living Systematic Reviews: An Emerging Opportunity to Narrow the Evidence-Practice Gap595 cited
  • 2018Machine learning for identifying Randomized Controlled Trials: An evaluation and practitioner's guide433 cited
  • 2017Living systematic reviews: 2. Combining human and machine effort354 cited
  • 2015Erratum to: Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches353 cited
  • 2018A review of recent publication trends from top publishing countries186 cited
  • 2009Encyclopedia of Medical Decision Making134 cited
  • 2013Reporting quality of diagnostic accuracy studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis of investigations on adherence to STARD119 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work