this work references cited by second hopReferences
- 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.44,857 cited
- 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement37,549 cited
- 2002Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis36,730 cited
- 2000Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting20,612 cited
- 2016ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions20,225 cited
- 2019Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions14,763 cited
- 2000Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis14,088 cited
- 2011GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence8,270 cited
- 2010A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis6,786 cited
- 1992Methods for Trend Estimation from Summarized Dose-Response Data, with Applications to Meta-Analysis2,352 cited
- 2015ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed2,266 cited
- 2010Meta-analysis of individual participant data: rationale, conduct, and reporting1,701 cited
- 2012The nuts and bolts of PROSPERO: an international prospective register of systematic reviews1,430 cited
- 2011GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence
Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work