SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Considerações sobre as condenações injustas fundamentadas em provas periciais: análise do Innocence Project, do National Registry of Exoneration e mecanismos para redução de erros periciais
9 references·0 citing·30 second hop
Considerações sobre as condenações injustas fundamentadas em provas periciais: análise do Innocence Project, do National Registry of Exoneration e mecanismos para redução de erros periciais (2021)Considerações sobre as condenações injust…Standard probatório para condenação e dúvida razoável no processo penal: análise das possíveis contribuições ao ordenamento brasileiro (2020)Standard probatório para cond…Interpreting Evidence (2016)Interpreting EvidenceStandards of Decision in Law: Psychological and Logical Bases for the Standard of Proof, Here and Abroad (2013)Standards of Decision in Law:…Kumho,Daubert, and the Nature of Scientific Inquiry: Implications for Forensic Anthropology* (2008)Kumho,Daubert, and the Nature…Wrongful Convictions and Innocence Projects in the UK: Help, Hope and Education (2006)Wrongful Convictions and Inno…The impact of the principles of evidence interpretation on the structure and content of statements (2000)The impact of the principles …Interpreting Evidence: Evaluating Forensic Science in the Courtroom (1995)Interpreting Evidence: Evalua…Exorcism of Ignorance as a Proxy for Rational Knowledge: The Lessons of Handwriting Identification "Expertise" (1989)Exorcism of Ignorance as a Pr…The Standard for Admitting Scientific Evidence: A Critique from the Perspective of Juror Psychology (1983)The Standard for Admitting Sc…Miscarriages of Justice (1988)Miscarriages of justice : a review of justice in error (1999)‘Evidence-based policy’ and the government of the criminal justice system - only if the evidence fits! (2004)Structuration Theory and Wrongful Imprisonment: From ‘Victimhood’ to ‘Survivorship’? (2010)Reasons to Doubt (2019)Interpretation of statistical evidence in criminal trials: The prosecutor's fallacy and the defense attorney's fallacy. (1987)The Evidential Foundations of Probabilistic Reasoning. (1995)A hierarchy of propositions: deciding which level to address in casework (1998)The nature of forensic science opinion—a possible framework to guide thinking and practicce in investigation and in court proceedings (2006)Evidence evaluation: A response to the court of appeal judgment in R v T (2011)Current perspectives in the interpretation of gunshot residues in forensic science: A review (2016)Determining the Sex of Human Remains Through Cranial Morphology (2005)Greater sciatic notch morphology: Sex, age, and population differences (2005)Evaluating the Accuracy and Precision of Cranial Morphological Traits for Sex Determination (2006)Forensic radiology and personal identification of unidentified bodies: a review (2011)The Impact of Daubert on the Admissibility of Forensic Anthropology Expert Testimony (2015)The need to incorporate human variation and evolutionary theory in forensic anthropology: A call for reform (2021)Los hechos en el derecho: bases argumentales de la prueba (1999)Truth, Error, and Criminal Law: An Essay in Legal Epistemology (2006)Prueba y verdad en el derecho (2017)The forensic scientist and the open mind (1991)Perceived strength of forensic scientists’ reporting statements about source conclusions (2018)A review of the current quality standards framework supporting forensic science: Risks and opportunities (2019)Towards another paradigm for forensic science? (2021)A model for case assessment and interpretation (1998)Pronouns as a preliminary diagnostic for grouping Papuan languages (2005)Justice In-Between (2022)Failed Forensics: How Forensic Science Lost Its Way and How It Might Yet Find It (2008)The Signature Effect: Signing Influences Consumption-Related Behavior by Priming Self-Identity (2011)Forensic culture as epistemic culture: The sociology of forensic science (2012)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1995Interpreting Evidence: Evaluating Forensic Science in the Courtroom368 cited
  • 2000The impact of the principles of evidence interpretation on the structure and content of statements209 cited
  • 2008Kumho,Daubert, and the Nature of Scientific Inquiry: Implications for Forensic Anthropology*139 cited
  • 2016Interpreting Evidence97 cited
  • 1989Exorcism of Ignorance as a Proxy for Rational Knowledge: The Lessons of Handwriting Identification "Expertise"87 cited
  • 2006Wrongful Convictions and Innocence Projects in the UK: Help, Hope and Education30 cited
  • 2013Standards of Decision in Law: Psychological and Logical Bases for the Standard of Proof, Here and Abroad25 cited
  • 2020Standard probatório para condenação e dúvida razoável no processo penal: análise das possíveis contribuições ao ordenamento brasileiro16 cited
  • 1983The Standard for Admitting Scientific Evidence: A Critique from the Perspective of Juror Psychology14 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work