References

• 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False10,471 cited
• 2015Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science8,516 cited
• 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False4,702 cited
• 20161,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility4,200 cited
• 2009How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data1,909 cited
• 2011Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets?1,885 cited
• 2016Evaluating replicability of laboratory experiments in economics1,314 cited
• 1994The scandal of poor medical research897 cited
• 2018The Proposal to Lower P Value Thresholds to .005654 cited
• 2016Evolution of Reporting P Values in the Biomedical Literature, 1990-2015370 cited
• 2021Reproducibility in machine learning for health research: Still a ways to go270 cited
• 2017The reproducibility of research and the misinterpretation of p -values258 cited
• 2013Single-center trials tend to provide larger treatment effects than multicenter trials: a systematic review171 cited
• 2018Reproducibility of clinical research in critical care: a scoping review87 cited
• 2015A surge of p -values between 0.041 and 0.049 in recent decades (but negative results are increasing rapidly too)