SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Level of Evidence Analysis in Journal of Maxillofacial Oral Surgery: A Twelve-Year Bibliometric Analysis of 1300 Publications (2009–2020)
7 references·1 citing·34 second hop
Level of Evidence Analysis in Journal of Maxillofacial Oral Surgery: A Twelve-Year Bibliometric Analysis of 1300 Publications (2009–2020) (2021)Level of Evidence Analysis in Journal of …Levels of Evidence in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Research: Have We Improved Over the Past 10 Years? (2019)Levels of Evidence in Plastic…Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? (2018)Is science really facing a re…Levels of Evidence in the Neurosurgical Literature (2012)Levels of Evidence in the Neu…Bibliometric analysis of the 'Electronic Library' journal (2000-2010) (2011)Bibliometric analysis of the …Levels of evidence and journal impact factor in oral and maxillofacial surgery (2006)Levels of evidence and journa…Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Assessing the quality of repo…Causal relationship between article citedness and journal impact (1994)Causal relationship between a…Level of evidence analysis of the Saudi Dental Journal: A bibliometric analysis of publications from 2012 to 2021 (2023)Level of evidence analysis of…Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. (1979)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Journal impact factor: a brief review. (1999)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)Publication bias in oral and maxillofacial surgery journals: An observation on published controlled trials (2009)Level of evidence of clinical spinal research and its correlation with journal impact factor (2013)Faculty appointment and promotion in Taiwan’s medical schools, a systematic analysis (2022)Incorporating variations in the quality of individual randomized trials into meta-analysis (1992)THE QUALITY OF REPORTING OF RANDOMIZED TRIALS IN THE JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY FROM 1988 THROUGH 2000 (2002)LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IN ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNALS (2005)Levels of Evidence in the Clinical Sports Medicine Literature (2014)Tenets for the Proper Conduct and Use of Meta-Analyses: A Practical Guide for Neurosurgeons (2022)1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility (2016)What does research reproducibility mean? (2016)The replicability crisis and public trust in psychological science (2018)Automation in the Life Science Research Laboratory (2020)To Sobol or not to Sobol? The effects of sampling schemes in systems biology applications (2021)Hierarchy of evidence: a framework for ranking evidence evaluating healthcare interventions (2002)The 100 Most-cited Articles in Abdominoplasty: A Bibliometric Analysis (2021)Global and Chinese publications in plastic surgery journals between 2010 and 2020: a bibliometric analysis (2022)Top-cited Articles in Endodontic Journals (2011)The 100 top-cited articles in orthodontics from 1975 to 2011 (2012)The 100 most cited articles in dentistry (2013)Citation rates and journal impact factors are not suitable for evaluation of research (1998)The Journal “Impact Factor” (1998)Developing Corporate Governance Research through Qualitative Methods: A Review of Previous Studies (2012)Publication trends in library and information science (2014)A grey zone for bibliometrics: publications indexed in Web of Science as anonymous (2022)Research on Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge: A Bibliometric Analysis From 2011 to 2020 (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1996Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?17,580 cited
  • 2018Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to?416 cited
  • 1994Causal relationship between article citedness and journal impact239 cited
  • 2012Levels of Evidence in the Neurosurgical Literature70 cited
  • 2006Levels of evidence and journal impact factor in oral and maxillofacial surgery50 cited
  • 2019Levels of Evidence in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Research: Have We Improved Over the Past 10 Years?35 cited
  • 2011Bibliometric analysis of the 'Electronic Library' journal (2000-2010)35 cited

Cited by

  • 2023Level of evidence analysis of the Saudi Dental Journal: A bibliometric analysis of publications from 2012 to 20218 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work