Comparing Recognition Performance and Robustness of Multimodal Deep Learning Models for Multimodal Emotion Recognition

Abstract

Multimodal signals are powerful for emotion recognition since they can represent emotions comprehensively. In this article, we compare the recognition performance and robustness of two multimodal emotion recognition models: 1) deep canonical correlation analysis (DCCA) and 2) bimodal deep autoencoder (BDAE). The contributions of this article are threefold: 1) we propose two methods for extending the original DCCA model for multimodal fusion: a) weighted sum fusion and b) attention-based fusion; 2) we systemically compare the performance of DCCA, BDAE, and traditional approaches on five multimodal data sets; and 3) we investigate the robustness of DCCA, BDAE, and traditional approaches on SEED-V and DREAMER data sets under two conditions: 1) adding noises to multimodal features and 2) replacing electroencephalography features with noises. Our experimental results demonstrate that DCCA achieves state-of-the-art recognition results on all five data sets: 1) 94.6% on the SEED data set; 2) 87.5% on the SEED-IV data set; 3) 84.3% and 85.6% on the DEAP data set; 4) 85.3% on the SEED-V data set; and 5) 89.0%, 90.6%, and 90.7% on the DREAMER data set. Meanwhile, DCCA has greater robustness when adding various amounts of noises to the SEED-V and DREAMER data sets. By visualizing features before and after DCCA transformation on the SEED-V data set, we find that the transformed features are more homogeneous and discriminative across emotions.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 455 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.