SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Os Autores brasileiros não citam os autores brasileiros: Nada mudou desde 1994
16 references·0 citing·44 second hop
Os Autores brasileiros não citam os autores brasileiros: Nada mudou desde 1994 (2021)Os Autores brasileiros não citam os autor…Selecting a Journal for Publication: Criteria to Consider. (2020)Selecting a Journal for Publi…Predatory journals: a major threat in orthopaedic research (2018)Predatory journals: a major t…A Learned Society's Perspective on Publishing (2016)A Learned Society's Perspecti…A importância da publicação científica para o desenvolvimento da saúde pública (2015)A importância da publicação c…The fifty most cited Latin-American articles in the orthopaedic literature (2013)The fifty most cited Latin-Am…Open access versus subscription journals: a comparison of scientific impact (2012)Open access versus subscripti…Indexed journal: What does it mean? (2012)Indexed journal: What does it…Proliferations of Scientific Medical Journals: A Burden or A Blessing (2010)Proliferations of Scientific …Bureaucrats, researchers, editors, and the impact factor - a vicious circle that is detrimental to science (2010)Bureaucrats, researchers, edi…The Trouble with Medical Journals (2006)The Trouble with Medical Jour…The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)The History and Meaning of th…Not-so-deep impact (2005)Not-so-deep impactWhy physicians should publish, how easy it is, and how important it is in clinical work (2003)Why physicians should publish…UNDERSTANDING THE LIMITATIONS OF THE JOURNAL IMPACT FACTOR (2003)UNDERSTANDING THE LIMITATIONS…Impact factors: facts and myths (2002)Impact factors: facts and myt…Citation rates and journal impact factors are not suitable for evaluation of research (1998)Citation rates and journal im…Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Journal impact factor: a brief review. (1999)Journal Prestige, Publication Bias, and Other Characteristics Associated With Citation of Published Studies in Peer-Reviewed Journals (2002)Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century—A review (2008)Impact factor: outdated artefact or stepping-stone to journal certification? (2011)Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations (2019)Ethical authorship and publishing (2008)Pesquisa qualitativa em saúde coletiva: panorama e desafios (2012)Investigating the current state and impact of the intellectual capital academic discipline (2013)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Problems of citation analysis: A critical review (1989)The skewness of science (1992)Scholarly communication and bibliometrics (2002)Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar (2007)Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories (2019)Open Access to the Scientific Journal Literature: Situation 2009 (2010)Self-Selected or Mandated, Open Access Increases Citation Impact for Higher Quality Research (2010)The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009 (2011)Anatomy of open access publishing: a study of longitudinal development and internal structure (2012)The STM Report: An overview of scientific and scholarly journal publishing (2015)How open science helps researchers succeed (2016)Fortnightly Review: How can impact factors be improved? (1996)Bibliometric Methods: Pitfalls and Possibilities (2005)LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IN ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNALS (2005)Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact (2001)Do Open-Access Articles Have a Greater Research Impact? (2004)A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases (2013)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)Impact Factor Distortions (2013)Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison (2017)A visualization review analysis of the last two decades for environmental Kuznets curve “EKC” based on co-citation analysis theory and pathfinder network scaling algorithms (2021)The ‘environmental stewardship-health nexus’ among Indigenous peoples: A global systematic literature review (2022)Challenges and needs of nurse researchers on research publication in health universities of Karnataka, India: a cross-sectional survey (2025)Bibliographic Databases: Some Critical Points (2013)Social Public Purchasing: Addressing a Critical Void in Public Purchasing Research (2021)Developing an interactive PBL environment via persuasive gamify elements: a scoping review (2022)Comparison of SCImago journal rank indicator with journal impact factor (2008)What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior (2008)Relative Citation Ratio (RCR): A New Metric That Uses Citation Rates to Measure Influence at the Article Level (2016)Media influence on Herceptin subsidization in Australia: application of the rule of rescue? (2008)Patenting and Licensing of University Research: Promoting Innovation or Undermining Academic Values? (2009)The Air We Breathe: A Critical Look at Practices and Alternatives in the Peer-Review Process (2009)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2006The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor2,877 cited
  • 2012Open access versus subscription journals: a comparison of scientific impact536 cited
  • 2003UNDERSTANDING THE LIMITATIONS OF THE JOURNAL IMPACT FACTOR298 cited
  • 1998Citation rates and journal impact factors are not suitable for evaluation of research238 cited
  • 2006The Trouble with Medical Journals168 cited
  • 2005Not-so-deep impact138 cited
  • 2002Impact factors: facts and myths52 cited
  • 2010Bureaucrats, researchers, editors, and the impact factor - a vicious circle that is detrimental to science48 cited
  • 2020Selecting a Journal for Publication: Criteria to Consider.47 cited
  • 2012Indexed journal: What does it mean?47 cited
  • 2018Predatory journals: a major threat in orthopaedic research42 cited
  • 2015A importância da publicação científica para o desenvolvimento da saúde pública28 cited
  • 2013The fifty most cited Latin-American articles in the orthopaedic literature24 cited
  • 2010Proliferations of Scientific Medical Journals: A Burden or A Blessing23 cited
  • 2016A Learned Society's Perspective on Publishing17 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2003
Why physicians should publish, how easy it is, and how important it is in clinical work
13 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.