SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Open science saves lives: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic
16 references·16 citing·42 second hopsampled
Open science saves lives: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)Open science saves lives: lessons from th…The evolving role of preprints in the dissemination of COVID-19 research and their impact on the science communication landscape (2021)The evolving role of preprint…Policy Response, Social Media and Science Journalism for the Sustainability of the Public Health System Amid the COVID-19 Outbreak: The Vietnam Lessons (2020)Policy Response, Social Media…Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond (2019)Open science challenges, bene…The preregistration revolution (2018)The preregistration revolutionWhat is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)What is open peer review? A s…A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)A manifesto for reproducible …1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility (2016)1,500 scientists lift the lid…The association between exaggeration in health related science news and academic press releases: retrospective observational study (2014)The association between exagg…Reproducibility in Science (2014)Reproducibility in ScienceScientific Utopia (2012)Scientific UtopiaGalaxy: a comprehensive approach for supporting accessible, reproducible, and transparent computational research in the life sciences (2010)Galaxy: a comprehensive appro…CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updat…CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updat…How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)How Many Scientists Fabricate…Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)Avoidable waste in the produc…Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)Strengthening the reporting o…Why is it important to implement meta-research in universities and institutes with medical research activities? (2025)Why is it important to implem…The academic impact of Open Science: a scoping review (2025)The academic impact of Open S…The societal impact of Open Science: a scoping review (2024)The societal impact of Open S…An analysis of the effects of sharing research data, code, and preprints on citations (2024)An analysis of the effects of…Trusting on the shoulders of open giants? Open science increases trust in science for the public and academics (2022)Trusting on the shoulders of …Transparency and reporting characteristics of COVID-19 randomized controlled trials (2022)Transparency and reporting ch…Tracking changes between preprint posting and journal publication during a pandemic (2022)Tracking changes between prep…The dynamics of trust and communication in COVID-19 vaccine decision making: A qualitative inquiry (2022)The dynamics of trust and com…Open data and data sharing in articles about COVID-19 published in preprint servers medRxiv and bioRxiv (2022)Open data and data sharing in…Institutionalizing Open Science in Africa: Limitations and Prospects (2022)Institutionalizing Open Scien…Correction of scientific literature: Too little, too late! (2022)Correction of scientific lite…Biogeosciences Perspectives on Integrated, Coordinated, Open, Networked (ICON) Science (2022)Biogeosciences Perspectives o…Reaping the benefits of open science in scholarly communication (2021)Reaping the benefits of open …Perspectives on Open Science and Scholarly Publishing: a Survey Study Focusing on Early Career Researchers in Europe (2021)Perspectives on Open Science …Credibility of preprints: an interdisciplinary survey of researchers (2020)Credibility of preprints: an …OECD Science, Technology and Innovation Outlook (2016)OECD Science, Technology and …The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (2014)Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software (1994)Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics (2004)Snakemake—a scalable bioinformatics workflow engine (2012)The Galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible and collaborative biomedical analyses: 2016 update (2016)Nextflow enables reproducible computational workflows (2017)The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1974)The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)Practical Meta-Analysis (2000)Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data (2010)Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (2012)Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Sustainable data analysis with Snakemake (2021)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1975)The case for motivated reasoning. (1990)Thinking, Fast and Slow (2011)Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015 (2018)Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings (2018)Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science (2021)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)A power primer. (1992)Beyond Power Calculations (2014)The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science (2015)Choosing Prediction Over Explanation in Psychology: Lessons From Machine Learning (2017)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research (2014)CONSORT Statement for Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatments: A 2017 Update and a CONSORT Extension for Nonpharmacologic Trial Abstracts (2017)The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017)Bioconda: sustainable and comprehensive software distribution for the life sciences (2018)The nf-core framework for community-curated bioinformatics pipelines (2020)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): Explanation and Elaboration (2015)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials13,365 cited
  • 2007Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies10,709 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials9,314 cited
  • 20161,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility4,200 cited
  • 2010Galaxy: a comprehensive approach for supporting accessible, reproducible, and transparent computational research in the life sciences3,455 cited
  • 2017A manifesto for reproducible science3,368 cited
  • 2009Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence2,204 cited
  • 2018The preregistration revolution1,972 cited
  • 2009How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data1,909 cited
  • 2012Scientific Utopia1,301 cited
  • 2014Reproducibility in Science1,031 cited
  • 2019Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond605 cited
  • 2021The evolving role of preprints in the dissemination of COVID-19 research and their impact on the science communication landscape556 cited
  • 2014The association between exaggeration in health related science news and academic press releases: retrospective observational study

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

489 cited
  • 2017What is open peer review? A systematic review453 cited
  • 2020Policy Response, Social Media and Science Journalism for the Sustainability of the Public Health System Amid the COVID-19 Outbreak: The Vietnam Lessons411 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2022Tracking changes between preprint posting and journal publication during a pandemic95 cited
    • 2020Credibility of preprints: an interdisciplinary survey of researchers83 cited
    • 2022Correction of scientific literature: Too little, too late!46 cited
    • 2024The societal impact of Open Science: a scoping review44 cited
    • 2022Trusting on the shoulders of open giants? Open science increases trust in science for the public and academics42 cited
    • 2025Why is it important to implement meta-research in universities and institutes with medical research activities?39 cited
    • 2024An analysis of the effects of sharing research data, code, and preprints on citations38 cited
    • 2022The dynamics of trust and communication in COVID-19 vaccine decision making: A qualitative inquiry38 cited
    • 2016OECD Science, Technology and Innovation Outlook34 cited
    • 2022Institutionalizing Open Science in Africa: Limitations and Prospects33 cited
    • 2022Open data and data sharing in articles about COVID-19 published in preprint servers medRxiv and bioRxiv28 cited
    • 2025The academic impact of Open Science: a scoping review26 cited
    • 2022Biogeosciences Perspectives on Integrated, Coordinated, Open, Networked (ICON) Science25 cited
    • 2022Transparency and reporting characteristics of COVID-19 randomized controlled trials25 cited
    • 2021Perspectives on Open Science and Scholarly Publishing: a Survey Study Focusing on Early Career Researchers in Europe22 cited
    • 2021Reaping the benefits of open science in scholarly communication22 cited