Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Artificial Moral Responsibility: How We Can and Cannot Hold Machines Responsible

16 references·6 citing·35 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2002Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases4,122 cited
2015Superintelligence: paths, dangers, strategies1,979 cited
2004On the Morality of Artificial Agents1,216 cited
2004The responsibility gap: Ascribing responsibility for the actions of learning automata1,095 cited
2009Moral machines: teaching robots right from wrong793 cited
2012Robot ethics: the ethical and social implications of robotics785 cited
2015Responsibility from the Margins664 cited
2007Killer Robots591 cited
2016The Threat of Algocracy: Reality, Resistance and Accommodation516 cited
2014What's the Point of Blame? A Paradigm Based Explanation481 cited
2007The Machine Question446 cited
2012Conversation and Responsibility445 cited
2012On banning autonomous weapon systems: human rights, automation, and the dehumanization of lethal decision-making371 cited
2012Conversation and Responsibility367 cited
2000Sentiment and Value365 cited
1996Accountability in a computerized society345 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Cited by

2022Blame It on the AI? On the Moral Responsibility of Artificial Moral Advisors54 cited
2023The Responsibility Gap and LAWS: a Critical Mapping of the Debate37 cited
2021Robot Responsibility and Moral Community33 cited
2023Blaming Humans and Machines: What Shapes People’s Reactions to Algorithmic Harm30 cited
2024Failures in the Loop: Human Leadership in AI-Based Decision-Making21 cited
2021Technological Answerability and the Severance Problem: Staying Connected by Demanding Answers16 cited