SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A roadmap toward the automatic composition of systematic literature reviews
16 references·3 citing·39 second hop
A roadmap toward the automatic composition of systematic literature reviews (2021)A roadmap toward the automatic compositio…Automation of systematic literature reviews: A systematic literature review (2021)Automation of systematic lite…Toward systematic review automation: a practical guide to using machine learning tools in research synthesis (2019)Toward systematic review auto…Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)Systematic review or scoping …Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches (2015)Using text mining for study i…Erratum to: Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches (2015)Erratum to: Using text mining…Automating data extraction in systematic reviews: a systematic review (2015)Automating data extraction in…Systematic review automation technologies (2014)Systematic review automation …Clarifying differences between review designs and methods (2012)Clarifying differences betwee…Applications of text mining within systematic reviews (2011)Applications of text mining w…Semi-automated screening of biomedical citations for systematic reviews (2010)Semi-automated screening of b…Supporting Systematic Reviews Using Text Mining (2009)Supporting Systematic Reviews…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies (2009)A typology of reviews: an ana…Poor reporting and inadequate searches were apparent in systematic reviews of adverse effects (2008)Poor reporting and inadequate…Reducing Workload in Systematic Review Preparation Using Automated Citation Classification (2005)Reducing Workload in Systemat…On the Use of Generative AI for Literature Reviews: An Exploration of Tools and Techniques (2024)On the Use of Generative AI f…ChatGPT application in Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering: an evaluation of its accuracy to support the selection activity (2024)ChatGPT application in System…AI meets academia: transforming systematic literature reviews (2024)AI meets academia: transformi…The American Heritage Word Frequency Book (1973)Developing Optimal Search Strategies for Detecting Clinically Sound Studies in MEDLINE (1994)Oxford English dictionary (2004)The Oxford English Dictionary Online (2004)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines (2019)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)An automated approach to identifying search terms for systematic reviews using keyword co‐occurrence networks (2019)Fact or Fiction: Verifying Scientific Claims (2020)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2020)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2021)Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews (2022)Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? (2010)Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry (2017)A declaração PRISMA 2020: diretriz atualizada para relatar revisões sistemáticas (2022)Meta‐analysis and traditional systematic literature reviews—What, why, when, where, and how? (2022)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)How Quickly Do Systematic Reviews Go Out of Date? A Survival Analysis (2007)A full systematic review was completed in 2 weeks using automation tools: a case study (2020)Artificial intelligence and the conduct of literature reviews (2021)Artificial intelligence to automate the systematic review of scientific literature (2023)Towards the automation of systematic reviews using natural language processing, machine learning, and deep learning: a comprehensive review (2024)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews (1994)An Introduction to Systematic Reviews (2013)Searching for and selecting studies (2019)Single screening versus conventional double screening for study selection in systematic reviews: a methodological systematic review (2019)Theories of behaviour and behaviour change across the social and behavioural sciences: a scoping review (2014)Using Qualitative Evidence in Decision Making for Health and Social Interventions: An Approach to Assess Confidence in Findings from Qualitative Evidence Syntheses (GRADE-CERQual) (2015)A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciences (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement63,979 cited
  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.44,857 cited
  • 2018Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach11,351 cited
  • 2009A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies10,781 cited
  • 2012Clarifying differences between review designs and methods1,061 cited
  • 2015Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches680 cited
  • 2019Toward systematic review automation: a practical guide to using machine learning tools in research synthesis635 cited
  • 2014Systematic review automation technologies471 cited
  • 2021Automation of systematic literature reviews: A systematic literature review430 cited
  • 2005Reducing Workload in Systematic Review Preparation Using Automated Citation Classification410 cited
  • 2015Erratum to: Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches353 cited
  • 2010Semi-automated screening of biomedical citations for systematic reviews351 cited
  • 2015Automating data extraction in systematic reviews: a systematic review286 cited
  • 2011

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Applications of text mining within systematic reviews
212 cited
  • 2009Supporting Systematic Reviews Using Text Mining144 cited
  • 2008Poor reporting and inadequate searches were apparent in systematic reviews of adverse effects99 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2024AI meets academia: transforming systematic literature reviews30 cited
    • 2024ChatGPT application in Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering: an evaluation of its accuracy to support the selection activity28 cited
    • 2024On the Use of Generative AI for Literature Reviews: An Exploration of Tools and Techniques20 cited