SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Do authors of research funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research comply with its open access mandate?: A meta-epidemiologic study
7 references·2 citing·39 second hop
Do authors of research funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research comply with its open access mandate?: A meta-epidemiologic study (2021)Do authors of research funded by the Cana…The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles (2018)The state of OA: a large-scal…Do authors comply when funders enforce open access to research? (2018)Do authors comply when funder…The State of OA: A large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles (2017)The State of OA: A large-scal…Guidelines for reporting meta-epidemiological methodology research (2017)Guidelines for reporting meta…The ethics of open access publishing (2013)The ethics of open access pub…G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences (2007)G*Power 3: A flexible statist…Citation Advantage of Open Access Articles (2006)Citation Advantage of Open Ac…Does funded research have a greater scholarly impact? A study of funded and non-funded research published in high-impact library and information science journals (2023)Does funded research have a g…Rethinking the open access citation advantage: Evidence from the “reverse‐flipping” journals (2022)Rethinking the open access ci…Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook (1975)GPOWER: A general power analysis program (1996)Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook (2005)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies (2015)Effect size guidelines for individual differences researchers (2016)The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason (1975)Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact (2001)The Access/Impact Problem and the Green and Gold Roads to Open Access (2004)Going, Going, Still There: Using the WebCite Service to Permanently Archive Cited Web Pages (2005)Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century—A review (2008)Bibliometrics: tracking research impact by selecting the appropriate metrics (2015)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Evaluation of the Endorsement of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement on the Quality of Published Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (2013)Rating the certainty in evidence in the absence of a single estimate of effect (2017)Agreement between the Cochrane risk of bias tool and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale: A meta-epidemiological study of randomized controlled trials of physical therapy interventions (2019)A tutorial on methodological studies: the what, when, how and why (2020)Assessment of publication bias and outcome reporting bias in systematic reviews of health services and delivery research: A meta-epidemiological study (2020)The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009 (2011)Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure (2018)The evaluation of scholarship in academic promotion and tenure processes: Past, present, and future (2018)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)The Burden of Knowledge and the “Death of the Renaissance Man”: Is Innovation Getting Harder? (2008)Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology (2019)The Effect of Journal Competition on Research Quality with Endogenous Choices of Open Access or Restricted Access (2023)Impact of open access on academic visibility: a systematic review of the literature (2025)The impact of research grant funding on scientific productivity (2011)Approaching the “reward triangle”: General analysis of the presence of funding acknowledgments and “peer interactive communication” in scientific publications (2012)How to boost scientific production? A statistical analysis of research funding and other influencing factors (2016)Artificial intelligence reveals unbalanced sustainability domains in funded research (2025)Open access journals and forensic publishing. (2014)Desafíos de la edición de revistas científicas en acceso abierto (2015)Should I publish in an open access journal? (2019)Low income countries have the highest percentages of open access publication: A systematic computational analysis of the biomedical literature (2019)Discipline-specific open access publishing practices and barriers to change: an evidence-based review (2020)Evaluating the impact of open access policies on research institutions (2020)Publication modalities ‘article in press’ and ‘open access’ in relation to journal average citation (2019)Open access publishers: The new players (2020)The effect of data sources on the measurement of open access: A comparison of Dimensions and the Web of Science (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2007G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences65,813 cited
  • 2018The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles1,217 cited
  • 2006Citation Advantage of Open Access Articles816 cited
  • 2017Guidelines for reporting meta-epidemiological methodology research514 cited
  • 2018Do authors comply when funders enforce open access to research?101 cited
  • 2017The State of OA: A large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles77 cited
  • 2013The ethics of open access publishing46 cited

Cited by

  • 2022Rethinking the open access citation advantage: Evidence from the “reverse‐flipping” journals12 cited
  • 2023Does funded research have a greater scholarly impact? A study of funded and non-funded research published in high-impact library and information science journals11 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work