SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Dashboard Shelves Open access My library Inbox Notes Write Learn Alerts

More

Ask your library Notifications Quick cite Review

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Docked vs. dockless equity: Comparing three micromobility service geographies · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleDocked vs. dockless equity: Comparing three micromobility service geographies

Si’an Meng2021

Article2021

Docked vs. dockless equity: Comparing three micromobility service geographies

Si’an Meng · Anne Brown

81 citations·0/0 files stored·Journal of Transport Geography

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Urban Transport and Accessibility Transportation Planning and Optimization Transportation and Mobility Innovations

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 81 citations exist upstream.

References

2010Travel and the Built Environment 2015Bikeshare: A Review of Recent Literature 2011Using Lorenz curves to assess public transport equity 2019A review on bike-sharing: The factors affecting bike-sharing demand 2018Understanding the usage of dockless bike sharing in Singapore 2020Dockless bike-sharing systems: what are the implications?2020A comparison in travel patterns and determinants of user demand between docked and dockless bike-sharing systems using multi-sourced data 2013A measure of equity for public transit connectivity

Cited by

2022Factors influencing bike share among underserved populations: Evidence from three U.S. cities 2025Integration of e-scooter sharing with public transit on employment accessibility and equity 2024A comparative analysis of the spatial determinants of e-bike and e-scooter sharing link flows 2022Disposable infrastructures: ‘Micromobility’ platforms and the political economy of transport disruption in Austin, Texas 2023Can dockless and docked bike-sharing substitute each other? Evidence from Nanjing, China

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2024How shared e-scooter programs affect docked bikeshare ridership in communities of concern: a tale of two citiesarticle · 14 shared references 2019Monitoring the first dockless bike sharing system in Greece: Understanding user perceptions, usage patterns and adoption barriersarticle · 8 shared references 2023Comparison of station-based and free-floating bikeshare systems as feeder modes to the metroarticle · 7 shared references 2022Review of bike-sharing system studies using bibliometrics methodarticle · 7 shared references 2021Motives and factors that determine city residents’ use of public bicycles. The case of Lodz, Polandarticle · 7 shared references 2023Can dockless and docked bike-sharing substitute each other? Evidence from Nanjing, Chinaarticle · 7 shared references

Details

Year2021

Typearticle

Published2021-09-03

VenueJournal of Transport Geography

ISSN-L0966-6923

Languageen

Citations81

Files0 public / 0

ShelfUrban Transport and Accessibility

Identifiers

doi10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.103185

openalex_workW3196648435

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.

2024Dockless or docked: Which bike-sharing mode is more environmentally friendly for the city? Current evidence from China's major cities

2024Mobility for the people: Equity requirements in US shared micromobility programs

2024Bikesharing and equity: A nationwide study of bikesharing accessibility in the U.S