SZodixStudyAcademic Library
DashboardShelvesOpen accessMy libraryInboxNotesWriteLearnAlerts
More
Ask your libraryNotificationsQuick citeReview
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Identifying evidence for five realist reviews in primary health care: A comparison of search methods
16 references·1 citing·49 second hop
Identifying evidence for five realist reviews in primary health care: A comparison of search methods (2021)Identifying evidence for five realist rev…Supporting social prescribing in primary care by linking people to local assets: a realist review (2020)Supporting social prescribing…Gray literature: An important resource in systematic reviews (2017)Gray literature: An important…Searching for qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews: a structured methodological review (2016)Searching for qualitative res…The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching (2015)The Role of Google Scholar in…Towards a methodology for cluster searching to provide conceptual and contextual “richness” for systematic reviews of complex interventions: case study (CLUSTER) (2013)Towards a methodology for clu…Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review (2013)Systematic Review of the Empi…Searching for grey literature for systematic reviews: challenges and benefits (2013)Searching for grey literature…THE EFFECT OF ENGLISH-LANGUAGE RESTRICTION ON SYSTEMATIC REVIEW-BASED META-ANALYSES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF EMPIRICAL STUDIES (2012)THE EFFECT OF ENGLISH-LANGUAG…Comparison of protocols and registry entries to published reports for randomised controlled trials (2011)Comparison of protocols and r…Checking reference lists to find additional studies for systematic reviews (2011)Checking reference lists to f…Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)Systematic reviews: CRD's gui…Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results (2009)Publication bias in clinical …Evidence‐based policy: a realist perspective (2007)Evidence‐based policy: a real…Digging for Nuggets: How ‘Bad’ Research Can Yield ‘Good’ Evidence (2006)Digging for Nuggets: How ‘Bad…Systematic reviews of health effects of social interventions: 2. Best available evidence: how low should you go? (2005)Systematic reviews of health …Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary sources (2005)Effectiveness and efficiency …A Tailored Approach: A model for literature searching in complex systematic reviews (2022)A Tailored Approach: A model …Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Searching for studies: a guide to information retrieval for Campbell systematic reviews (2017)Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts (2018)Intersectionality in quantitative health disparities research: A systematic review of challenges and limitations in empirical studies (2021)Does the inclusion of grey literature influence estimates of intervention effectiveness reported in meta-analyses? (2000)Grey literature: An important resource in systematic reviews (2017)The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis (2019)Education for AI, not AI for Education: The Role of Education and Ethics in National AI Policy Strategies (2021)Infodemics and health misinformation: a systematic review of reviews (2022)Case Study Research: Design and Methods (1984)The theory of planned behavior (1991)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews (2014)PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies (2018)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context (2000)Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2005)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist (2020)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2020)The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity (2020)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)A meta-analytic review of the association between perceived social support and depression in childhood and adolescence. (2016)A critical analysis of the impacts of COVID-19 on the global economy and ecosystems and opportunities for circular economy strategies (2020)A typology of circular economy discourses: Navigating the diverse visions of a contested paradigm (2020)The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence (1990)Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Application of systematic review methodology to food and feed safety assessments to support decision making (2010)Stopping Randomized Trials Early for Benefit and Estimation of Treatment Effects Systematic Review and Meta-regression Analysis (2010)Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomised controlled trials: combined analysis of meta-epidemiological studies. (2012)Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: A review of possible methods (2005)Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups (2006)Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases (2010)Making Sense of Assessment Feedback in Higher Education (2013)Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (2007)Open access: The true cost of science publishing (2013)Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: a systematic literature review (2019)Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources (2019)The ABC of systematic literature review: the basic methodological guidance for beginners (2020)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Defining the process to literature searching in systematic reviews: a literature review of guidance and supporting studies (2018)Meeting the review family: exploring review types and associated information retrieval requirements (2019)Quality assessment with diverse studies (QuADS): an appraisal tool for methodological and reporting quality in systematic reviews of mixed- or multi-method studies (2021)Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews (1994)Could virtual reality applications pose real risks to children and adolescents? A systematic review of ethical issues and concerns (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2010Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care3,245 cited
  • 2015The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching2,381 cited
  • 2005Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary sources2,042 cited
  • 2017Gray literature: An important resource in systematic reviews1,453 cited
  • 2012THE EFFECT OF ENGLISH-LANGUAGE RESTRICTION ON SYSTEMATIC REVIEW-BASED META-ANALYSES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF EMPIRICAL STUDIES1,256 cited
  • 2013Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review1,126 cited
  • 2009Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results897 cited
  • 2013Searching for grey literature for systematic reviews: challenges and benefits814 cited
  • 2016Searching for qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews: a structured methodological review573 cited
  • 2011Checking reference lists to find additional studies for systematic reviews445 cited
  • 2007Evidence‐based policy: a realist perspective414 cited
  • 2006Digging for Nuggets: How ‘Bad’ Research Can Yield ‘Good’ Evidence317 cited
  • 2013Towards a methodology for cluster searching to provide conceptual and contextual “richness” for systematic reviews of complex interventions: case study (CLUSTER)286 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2020Supporting social prescribing in primary care by linking people to local assets: a realist review244 cited
  • 2011Comparison of protocols and registry entries to published reports for randomised controlled trials243 cited
  • 2005Systematic reviews of health effects of social interventions: 2. Best available evidence: how low should you go?167 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2022A Tailored Approach: A model for literature searching in complex systematic reviews23 cited