SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Systematic reviews in engineering education: a catalyst for change
16 references·0 citing·31 second hop
Systematic reviews in engineering education: a catalyst for change (2021)Systematic reviews in engineering educati…Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement (2021)Updating guidance for reporti…Open Science now: A systematic literature review for an integrated definition (2018)Open Science now: A systemati…1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility (2016)1,500 scientists lift the lid…Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Preferred reporting items for…Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)Preferred reporting items for…Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings (2015)Methods of Meta-Analysis: Cor…Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Estimating the reproducibilit…Systematic Literature Reviews in Engineering Education and Other Developing Interdisciplinary Fields (2014)Systematic Literature Reviews…Publication and other reporting biases in cognitive sciences: detection, prevalence, and prevention (2014)Publication and other reporti…An Agenda for Purely Confirmatory Research (2012)An Agenda for Purely Confirma…Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (2011)Publication Manual of the Ame…Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Research Methods in Engineering Education (2009)Quantitative, Qualitative, an…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences (2006)Systematic Reviews in the Soc…The System of Professions (1988)The System of ProfessionsWhy Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs (2013)Estimating Psychological Networks and their Accuracy: A Tutorial Paper (2016)Redefine statistical significance (2017)A tutorial on regularized partial correlation networks. (2018)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2020)Declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas (2021)Declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META‐ANALYSIS (1991)A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis (2010)A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)Bioconda: sustainable and comprehensive software distribution for the life sciences (2018)The nf-core framework for community-curated bioinformatics pipelines (2020)The “Actors” of Modern Society: The Cultural Construction of Social Agency (2000)Educational Policy and Accreditation Standards (2001)The Autonomy Paradox: The Implications of Mobile Email Devices for Knowledge Professionals (2013)Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews (2008)Purposeful Sampling in Qualitative Research Synthesis (2011)Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement63,979 cited
  • 2015Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement26,189 cited
  • 2015Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation13,108 cited
  • 2015Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science8,516 cited
  • 1988The System of Professions7,723 cited
  • 2015Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings5,540 cited
  • 20161,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility4,200 cited
  • 2006Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences3,582 cited
  • 2021Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement3,479 cited
  • 2011Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association3,167 cited
  • 2012An Agenda for Purely Confirmatory Research1,041 cited
  • 2009Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Research Methods in Engineering Education773 cited
  • 2018Open Science now: A systematic literature review for an integrated definition709 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2014
Systematic Literature Reviews in Engineering Education and Other Developing Interdisciplinary Fields
622 cited
  • 2014Publication and other reporting biases in cognitive sciences: detection, prevalence, and prevention471 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.