Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

“Are psychological attributes quantitative?” is not an empirical question: Conceptual confusions in the measurement debate

13 references·5 citing·44 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1967Philosophical Investigations.3,995 cited
2005Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience1,804 cited
1997Quantitative science and the definition of measurement in psychology426 cited
2000Normal Science, Pathological Science and Psychometrics267 cited
2010Methodological thinking in psychology : 60 years gone astray?183 cited
2003The Quantitative Imperative169 cited
1997Toward a theoretical psychology: Should a subdiscipline be formally recognized?128 cited
2011Thermoscopes, thermometers, and the foundations of measurement119 cited
2015On the philosophical foundations of psychological measurement87 cited
2011Constructs, inferences, and mental measurement68 cited
2011Statisticism in personality psychologists’ use of trait constructs: What is it? How was it contracted? Is there a cure?62 cited
2016Quantification in psychology: Critical analysis of an unreflective practice.62 cited
2006Quantitative research as an interpretive enterprise: The mostly unacknowledged role of interpretation in research efforts and suggestions for explicitly interpretive quantitative investigations58 cited

Cited by

2022Rating scales institutionalise a network of logical errors and conceptual problems in research practices: A rigorous analysis showing ways to tackle psychology’s crises

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

28 cited

2022Sense and nonsense in psychological measurement: A case of problem and method passing one another by7 cited

2021Denying Descartes and wary of Wittgenstein: Response to Franz5 cited

2024Science or not, conceptual problems remain: Seeking conceptual clarity around “psychology as a science” debates4 cited

2022Psychological measurement is highly questionable but the details remain controversial: A response to Tafreshi, Michell, and Trendler2 cited