SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
ОНЛАЙН ЕНЦИКЛОПЕДІЇ США ЯК СУЧАСНІ ОСВІТНІ РЕСУРСИ
5 references·1 citing·28 second hop
ОНЛАЙН ЕНЦИКЛОПЕДІЇ США ЯК СУЧАСНІ ОСВІТНІ РЕСУРСИ (2021)ОНЛАЙН ЕНЦИКЛОПЕДІЇ США ЯК СУЧАСНІ ОСВІТН…Digital humanities and databases of cultural heritage in libraries of Ukraine (2020)Digital humanities and databa…Do Experts Or Crowd-Based Models Produce More Bias? Evidence from Encyclopedia Britannica and Wikipedia1 (2018)Do Experts Or Crowd-Based Mod…Perceived credibility of Internet encyclopedias (2010)Perceived credibility of Inte…On Trusting Wikipedia (2009)On Trusting WikipediaInternet encyclopaedias go head to head (2005)Internet encyclopaedias go he…Ukrainian electronic based encyclopedias in light of socio-humanities (2021)Ukrainian electronic based en…Experiments with interactional expertise (2006)Toward an epistemology ofWikipedia (2008)Systems-oriented social epistemology (2010)Topic familiarity and information skills in online credibility evaluation (2012)Knowledge, Democracy, and the Internet (2016)Marketing Research: Methodological Foundations (1977)The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion (1986)Managing brand equity : capitalizing on the value of a brand name. (1991)What We Know About Wikipedia: A Review of the Literature Analyzing the Project(s) (2012)The influence of source cues and topic familiarity on credibility evaluation (2013)Making sense of credibility in complex information environments: the role of message sidedness, information source, and thinking styles in credibility evaluation online (2018)Beyond Accuracy: What Data Quality Means to Data Consumers (1996)Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises (1998)Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice1 (2005)Gender inequality in new media: Evidence from Wikipedia (2019)Survey of expert opinion on intelligence: Intelligence research, experts' background, controversial issues, and the media (2019)The Gender Bias Tug-of-War in a Co-creation Community: Core-Periphery Tension on Wikipedia (2020)The Productive Unease of 21st-century Digital Scholarship (2009)Controversies around the Digital Humanities: An Agenda (2012)DIGITAL CULTURAL HERITAGE MEETS DIGITAL HUMANITIES (2019)DIGITAL HUMANITARIAN PROJECT AS A COMPONENT OF DIGITAL HUMANITIES (2021)Visual Content of Social Media as an Object of Library Deposit(case of the content related to 2022 war) (2022)Digital Marketing Activities and Innovative Forms of Using Archival Information (2024)Reading on Paper and Digitally: What the Past Decades of Empirical Research Reveal (2017)The spread of true and false news online (2018)Wikis, blogs and podcasts: a new generation of Web-based tools for virtual collaborative clinical practice and education (2006)Full Disclosure (2007)Public Health and Online Misinformation: Challenges and Recommendations (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005Internet encyclopaedias go head to head1,978 cited
  • 2018Do Experts Or Crowd-Based Models Produce More Bias? Evidence from Encyclopedia Britannica and Wikipedia194 cited
  • 2010Perceived credibility of Internet encyclopedias61 cited
  • 2009On Trusting Wikipedia53 cited
  • 2020Digital humanities and databases of cultural heritage in libraries of Ukraine30 cited

Cited by

  • 2021Ukrainian electronic based encyclopedias in light of socio-humanities17 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work