SZodixStudyAcademic Library
DashboardShelvesOpen accessMy libraryInboxNotesWriteLearnAlerts
More
Ask your libraryNotificationsQuick citeReview
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Systematic review and meta-analyses of studies analysing instructions to authors from 1987 to 2017
16 references·9 citing·41 second hop
Systematic review and meta-analyses of studies analysing instructions to authors from 1987 to 2017 (2021)Systematic review and meta-analyses of st…Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison (2017)Potential predatory and legit…Reproducibility: A tragedy of errors (2016)Reproducibility: A tragedy of…Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)Rayyan—a web and mobile app f…Meta-research: Evaluation and Improvement of Research Methods and Practices (2015)Meta-research: Evaluation and…Relation of completeness of reporting of health research to journals' endorsement of reporting guidelines: systematic review (2014)Relation of completeness of r…Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research (2014)Reducing waste from incomplet…Evaluation of the Endorsement of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement on the Quality of Published Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (2013)Evaluation of the Endorsement…Reporting Guidelines for Survey Research: An Analysis of Published Guidance and Reporting Practices (2011)Reporting Guidelines for Surv…A Systematic Review of Research on the Meaning, Ethics and Practices of Authorship across Scholarly Disciplines (2011)A Systematic Review of Resear…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Avoidable Waste in the Production and Reporting of Research Evidence (2009)Avoidable Waste in the Produc…Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)Avoidable waste in the produc…Endorsement of the CONSORT Statement by high impact factor medical journals: a survey of journal editors and journal 'Instructions to Authors' (2008)Endorsement of the CONSORT St…The introduction, methods, results, and discussion (IMRAD) structure: a fifty-year survey. (2004)The introduction, methods, re…A systematic examination of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) use guidelines in applied linguistics journals (2025)A systematic examination of g…Emerging technologies and research ethics: Developing editorial policy using a scoping review and reference panel (2024)Emerging technologies and res…Why research integrity matters and how it can be improved (2023)Why research integrity matter…Transparency in conducting and reporting research: A survey of authors, reviewers, and editors across scholarly disciplines (2023)Transparency in conducting an…Research integrity in randomized clinical trials: A scoping umbrella review (2023)Research integrity in randomi…International multi‐stakeholder consensus statement on clinical trial integrity (2023)International multi‐stakehold…Integrity of randomized clinical trials: Performance of integrity tests and checklists requires assessment (2023)Integrity of randomized clini…Assessing the Integrity of Clinical Trials Included in Evidence Syntheses (2023)Assessing the Integrity of Cl…Statistical Guidance to Authors at Top-Ranked Journals across Scientific Disciplines (2022)Statistical Guidance to Autho…Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries (2011)Policy: NIH plans to enhance reproducibility (2014)Reproducibility in Science (2014)Meta-assessment of bias in science (2017)Meta-research: Why research on research matters (2018)A standardized citation metrics author database annotated for scientific field (2019)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2015)The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017)Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT-AI extension (2020)Improving the Quality of Web Surveys: The Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES) (2004)Mail and internet surveys : the tailored design method (2007)Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method (2007)Are Peer Reviewers Encouraged to Use Reporting Guidelines? A Survey of 116 Health Research Journals (2012)Conducting Online Surveys (2019)Global Overview of Response Rates in Patient and Health Care Professional Surveys in Surgery (2020)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)La extensión de la declaración PRISMA para revisiones sistemáticas que incorporan metaanálisis en red: PRISMA-NMA (2016)Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review (2017)Guidelines for reporting meta-epidemiological methodology research (2017)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts (2007)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews? (2008)Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane reviewa (2012)Systematic review automation technologies (2014)How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a “Core Outcome Set” – a practical guideline (2016)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Digital Mental Health Interventions for Depression, Anxiety, and Enhancement of Psychological Well-Being Among College Students: Systematic Review (2019)An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews (2021)Barriers to and Facilitators of User Engagement With Digital Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Review (2021)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)CONSORT Statement for Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatments: A 2017 Update and a CONSORT Extension for Nonpharmacologic Trial Abstracts (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement63,979 cited
  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.44,857 cited
  • 2016Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews25,980 cited
  • 2009Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence2,204 cited
  • 2014Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research1,315 cited
  • 2013Evaluation of the Endorsement of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement on the Quality of Published Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses881 cited
  • 2009Avoidable Waste in the Production and Reporting of Research Evidence600 cited
  • 2015Meta-research: Evaluation and Improvement of Research Methods and Practices492 cited
  • 2011Reporting Guidelines for Survey Research: An Analysis of Published Guidance and Reporting Practices397 cited
  • 2011A Systematic Review of Research on the Meaning, Ethics and Practices of Authorship across Scholarly Disciplines394 cited
  • 2017Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison384 cited
  • 2004The introduction, methods, results, and discussion (IMRAD) structure: a fifty-year survey.364 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2016Reproducibility: A tragedy of errors255 cited
  • 2014Relation of completeness of reporting of health research to journals' endorsement of reporting guidelines: systematic review241 cited
  • 2008Endorsement of the CONSORT Statement by high impact factor medical journals: a survey of journal editors and journal 'Instructions to Authors'241 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2023Why research integrity matters and how it can be improved47 cited
    • 2023Transparency in conducting and reporting research: A survey of authors, reviewers, and editors across scholarly disciplines32 cited
    • 2023International multi‐stakeholder consensus statement on clinical trial integrity29 cited
    • 2023Research integrity in randomized clinical trials: A scoping umbrella review24 cited
    • 2023Assessing the Integrity of Clinical Trials Included in Evidence Syntheses23 cited
    • 2022Statistical Guidance to Authors at Top-Ranked Journals across Scientific Disciplines21 cited
    • 2023Integrity of randomized clinical trials: Performance of integrity tests and checklists requires assessment20 cited
    • 2024Emerging technologies and research ethics: Developing editorial policy using a scoping review and reference panel20 cited
    • 2025A systematic examination of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) use guidelines in applied linguistics journals14 cited