A review and critique of auxiliary information-based process monitoring methods

Abstract

We review the rapidly growing literature on auxiliary information-based (AIB) process monitoring methods. Under this approach, there is an assumption that the auxiliary variable, which is correlated with the quality variable of interest, has a known mean, or some other parameter, which cannot change over time. We demonstrate that violations of this assumption can have serious adverse effects both when the process is stable and when there has been a process shift. Some process shifts in the quality variable of interest can become undetectable. We also show that the basic AIB approach is a special case of simple linear regression profile monitoring. The AIB charting techniques require strong assumptions. Based on our results, we warn against the uncritical use of the AIB approach in quality control applications.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 21 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.