SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Development and implementation of research integrity guidance documents: Explorative interviews with research integrity experts
16 references·3 citing·48 second hop
Development and implementation of research integrity guidance documents: Explorative interviews with research integrity experts (2021)Development and implementation of researc…The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity (2020)The Hong Kong Principles for …To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales (2019)To saturate or not to saturat…Thematic Analysis (2019)Thematic AnalysisAustralian code for the responsible conduct of research (2018)Australian code for the respo…The pressure to publish pushes down quality (2016)The pressure to publish pushe…Ranking major and minor research misbehaviors: results from a survey among participants of four World Conferences on Research Integrity (2016)Ranking major and minor resea…Misconduct Policies, Academic Culture and Career Stage, Not Gender or Pressures to Publish, Affect Scientific Integrity (2015)Misconduct Policies, Academic…Conducting Semi‐Structured Interviews (2015)Conducting Semi‐Structured In…Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Man…Successful Qualitative Research: A practical guide for beginners (2014)Successful Qualitative Resear…The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (2013)The San Francisco Declaration…Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals (2012)Consolidated standards of rep…The Singapore Statement on Research Integrity (2011)The Singapore Statement on Re…Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data (2010)Do Pressures to Publish Incre…Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Consolidated criteria for rep…Using thematic analysis in psychology (2006)Using thematic analysis in ps…How Competition for Funding Impacts Scientific Practice: Building Pre-fab Houses but no Cathedrals (2024)How Competition for Funding I…Co-creating Research Integrity Education Guidelines for Research Institutions (2023)Co-creating Research Integrit…Fostering a research integrity culture: Actionable advice for institutions (2022)Fostering a research integrit…The cochrane database of systematic reviews (1996)Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises (1998)Science and Engineering Indicators (2004)Why Science Is Not Necessarily Self-Correcting (2012)Reducing implicit racial preferences: I. A comparative investigation of 17 interventions. (2014)ChatGPT and the rise of large language models: the new AI-driven infodemic threat in public health (2023)Qualitative evaluation and research methods (1990)Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (1994)Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (1998)Older Adults' Reasons for Using Technology while Aging in Place (2015)Thematic Analysis (2017)Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis (2019)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? (2015)Science Mapping: A Systematic Review of the Literature (2017)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane reviewa (2012)A taxonomy of behaviour change methods: an Intervention Mapping approach (2015)Handbook of Qualitative Research (1994)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study (2013)Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (2014)The Long Interview (1988)Customers’ motivation to engage with luxury brands on social media (2020)Preparing, conducting, and analyzing Delphi surveys: Cross-disciplinary practices, new directions, and advancements (2021)The determinants of organizational change management success: Literature review and case study (2021)The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. (1968)Naturalistic inquiry (1985)Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern‐based qualitative analytic approaches (2020)Toward good practice in thematic analysis: Avoiding common problems and be(com)ing a knowing researcher (2022)Supporting best practice in reflexive thematic analysis reporting in Palliative Medicine : A review of published research and introduction to the Reflexive Thematic Analysis Reporting Guidelines (RTARG) (2024)A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)The preregistration revolution (2018)Methodology over metrics: current scientific standards are a disservice to patients and society (2021)Prevalence of questionable research practices, research misconduct and their potential explanatory factors: A survey among academic researchers in The Netherlands (2022)A typology of validity: content, face, convergent, discriminant, nomological and predictive validity (2024)How Many Interviews Are Enough? (2005)‘A starting point for your journey, not a map’: Nikki Hayfield in conversation with Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke about thematic analysis (2019)Applying Thematic Analysis to Education: A Hybrid Approach to Interpreting Data in Practitioner Research (2020)Learning to Do Qualitative Data Analysis: A Starting Point (2020)One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? (2020)Thematic Analysis (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2006Using thematic analysis in psychology193,725 cited
  • 2007Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups42,389 cited
  • 2014Successful Qualitative Research: A practical guide for beginners6,661 cited
  • 2019To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales4,749 cited
  • 2015Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics2,816 cited
  • 2019Thematic Analysis2,795 cited
  • 2015Conducting Semi‐Structured Interviews1,649 cited
  • 2010Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data804 cited
  • 2012Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals739 cited
  • 2020The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity545 cited
  • 2018Australian code for the responsible conduct of research382 cited
  • 2011The Singapore Statement on Research Integrity316 cited
  • 2015Misconduct Policies, Academic Culture and Career Stage, Not Gender or Pressures to Publish, Affect Scientific Integrity267 cited
  • 2013The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment262 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2016Ranking major and minor research misbehaviors: results from a survey among participants of four World Conferences on Research Integrity211 cited
  • 2016The pressure to publish pushes down quality204 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2022Fostering a research integrity culture: Actionable advice for institutions25 cited
    • 2024How Competition for Funding Impacts Scientific Practice: Building Pre-fab Houses but no Cathedrals21 cited
    • 2023Co-creating Research Integrity Education Guidelines for Research Institutions19 cited