Postponement and logistics flexibility in retailing: The moderating role of logistics integration and demand uncertainty

Hamid Jafari · Mohammad H. Eslami · Antony Paulraj

42 citations0/0 files storedInternational Journal of Production Economics

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Supply Chain and Inventory Management Quality and Supply Management Sustainable Supply Chain Management

Abstract

Dynamic capabilities such as flexibility are considered influential in achieving superior performance, especially under uncertain circumstances. Among others, postponement is a well-established concept in operations and supply chain management (OSCM) and has been regarded as a key concept in managing supply and demand while increasing flexibility. This study investigates the effect of postponement on logistics flexibility, and that of the latter on retail firm performance. In addition, the moderating roles of logistics integration and demand uncertainty on these relationships are investigated. The study utilizes a quantitative survey and draws on a sample of 261 retailers in Sweden. Logistics flexibility proves to have a mediating role in the postponement–performance relationship. Furthermore, we provide support for the direct effect that postponement can have on logistics flexibility, and the subsequent effect of logistics flexibility on retail firm performance. We contribute by simultaneously studying postponement and logistics flexibility in the retailing context. We find conditional support for the moderating roles of logistics integration and demand uncertainty. The results show that for medium levels of uncertainty, the positive relationship between postponement and logistics flexibility, as well as logistics flexibility and firm performance, are intensified. From a practical standpoint, the findings underline that in the presence of high or low demand uncertainty, applying postponement may not always be beneficial in achieving logistics flexibility, and subsequently better performance. Moreover, if retailers prioritize logistics integration, they should not always expect superior performance gains from the flexibility benefits of postponement.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 42 citations exist upstream.

References

1981Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error 1951Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests 1997Dynamic capabilities and strategic management 1984A resource‐based view of the firm 2015A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM)1986Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects 2007Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance 2000Dynamic capabilities: what are they?

Cited by

2023Sustainable and resilient supplier selection in the context of circular economy: an ontology-based model 2022Leveraging supply integration, mass customization and manufacturing flexibility capabilities and the contingency of innovation orientation 2024Navigating the intersection between postponement strategies and additive manufacturing: insights and research agenda

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.