SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Vantagens e desvantagens da revisão por pares aberta: consensos e dissensos na literatura
6 references·0 citing·26 second hop
Vantagens e desvantagens da revisão por pares aberta: consensos e dissensos na literatura (2021)Vantagens e desvantagens da revisão por p…What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)What is open peer review? A s…Opening peer-review: the democracy of science (2014)Opening peer-review: the demo…Current and Evolving Models of Peer Review (2014)Current and Evolving Models o…Evaluations by Peer Review in Science (2013)Evaluations by Peer Review in…Defining and Characterizing Open Peer Review: A Review of the Literature (2013)Defining and Characterizing O…Como Elaborar Projetos de Pesquisa (2010)Como Elaborar Projetos de Pes…Impact of bibliometrics upon the science system: Inadvertent consequences? (2005)Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals (2006)Bibliometrics and Citation Analysis: From the Science Citation Index to Cybermetrics (2009)Ocena ekspercka jako trzeci wymiar ewaluacji krajowych czasopism naukowych (2016)Peer Review in Academia (2022)Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank (2013)Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)The need for a formalised system of Quality Control for environmental policy-science (2017)Ten strategies for avoiding and overcoming authorship conflicts in academic publishing (2021)Enhancing the review process in global environmental assessments: The case of the IPCC (2022)Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial (1999)Making Reviewers Visible (2002)Multi-Stage Open Peer Review: Scientific Evaluation Integrating the Strengths of Traditional Peer Review with the Virtues of Transparency and Self-Regulation (2012)Open access journals and forensic publishing. (2014)The gift of a hoax (2019)Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system (1977)Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)The evaluation of scholarship in academic promotion and tenure processes: Past, present, and future (2018)Dynamics of cumulative advantage and threats to equity in open science: a scoping review (2022)Open-access mega-journals (2017)Open peer review: promoting transparency in open science (2020)Science-related populism: Conceptualizing populist demands toward science (2020)Testing for competence rather than for "intelligence." (1973)Assessment for Learning in Higher Education (2012)Fatores associados ao comportamento da população durante o isolamento social na pandemia de COVID-19 (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2010Como Elaborar Projetos de Pesquisa33,468 cited
  • 2017What is open peer review? A systematic review232 cited
  • 2013Defining and Characterizing Open Peer Review: A Review of the Literature136 cited
  • 2014Current and Evolving Models of Peer Review36 cited
  • 2014Opening peer-review: the democracy of science19 cited
  • 2013Evaluations by Peer Review in Science14 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work