SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Selling science: optimizing the research funding evaluation and decision process
16 references·1 citing·58 second hop
Selling science: optimizing the research funding evaluation and decision process (2021)Selling science: optimizing the research …Academics as Agentic Superheroes: Female academics’ lack of fit with the agentic stereotype of success limits their career advancement (2021)Academics as Agentic Superher…The Facade of Fit in Faculty Search Processes (2020)The Facade of Fit in Faculty …Inside the Black Box of Organizational Life: The Gendered Language of Performance Assessment (2020)Inside the Black Box of Organ…What Words Are Worth: National Science Foundation Grant Abstracts Indicate Award Funding (2019)What Words Are Worth: Nationa…Committees with implicit biases promote fewer women when they do not believe gender bias exists (2019)Committees with implicit bias…The Matthew effect in science funding (2018)The Matthew effect in science…Studying grant decision-making: a linguistic analysis of review reports (2018)Studying grant decision-makin…Raising Doubt in Letters of Recommendation for Academia: Gender Differences and Their Impact (2018)Raising Doubt in Letters of R…When Two Bodies Are (Not) a Problem: Gender and Relationship Status Discrimination in Academic Hiring (2017)When Two Bodies Are (Not) a P…Systematic Subjectivity: How Subtle Biases Infect the Scholarship Review Process (2017)Systematic Subjectivity: How …Gender Stereotypes and Venture Support Decisions: How Governmental Venture Capitalists Socially Construct Entrepreneurs’ Potential (2017)Gender Stereotypes and Ventur…Presumed incompetent: perceived lack of fit and gender bias in recruitment and selection (2015)Presumed incompetent: perceiv…Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines (2015)Expectations of brilliance un…Competitive Research Grants and Their Impact on Career Performance (2014)Competitive Research Grants a…A Quantitative Linguistic Analysis of National Institutes of Health R01 Application Critiques From Investigators at One Institution (2014)A Quantitative Linguistic Ana…Othering women: fluid images of the ideal academic (2012)Othering women: fluid images …Online panel work through a gender lens: implications of digital peer review meetings (2022)Online panel work through a g…Sex Differences in Mental Test Scores, Variability, and Numbers of High-Scoring Individuals (1995)Expectancy–Value Theory of Achievement Motivation (2000)Gender Gap in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM): Current Knowledge, Implications for Practice, Policy, and Future Directions (2016)Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others? (2016)Gender Stereotypes (2017)National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations (2001)University Research Evaluation and Funding: An International Comparison (2003)The Impact of Research Collaboration on Scientific Productivity (2005)Developing a methodology to assess the impact of research grant funding: A mixed methods approach (2014)The determinants of research performance in European universities: a large scale multilevel analysis (2017)The Way We Ask for Money… The Emergence and Institutionalization of Grant Writing Practices in Academia (2018)The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. (1967)Building Theories from Case Study Research (1989)The Discovery of Grounded Theory (2017)Assessing gender bias in qualitative evaluations of surgical residents (2018)Advancing Qualitative Entrepreneurship Research: Leveraging Methodological Plurality for Achieving Scholarly Impact (2020)Stemming the gender gap in STEM entrepreneurship – insights into women’s entrepreneurship in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (2020)Case Study Research: Design and Methods (1984)Case Study Research: Design and Methods (1991)Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (1994)Scaling Down Inequality: Rating Scales, Gender Bias, and the Architecture of Evaluation (2019)Structural Sexism and Health in the United States: A New Perspective on Health Inequality and the Gender System (2019)Exploratory Research (2020)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1974)The trouble with overconfidence. (2008)Promoting an open research culture (2015)Moderation in sport management research: room for growth (2018)Making Black Lives Matter in academia: A Black feminist call for collective action against anti‐blackness in the academy (2020)Epistemic injustice and hegemonic ordeal in management and organization studies: Advancing Black scholarship (2021)Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error (1981)On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models (1988)Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. (1988)Nudging Toward Diversity: Applying Behavioral Design to Faculty Hiring (2020)Gender bias in reference letters for residency and academic medicine: a systematic review (2021)Why so Few, Still? Challenges to Attracting, Advancing, and Keeping Women Faculty of Color in Academia (2022)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)Chance and Consensus in Peer Review (1981)Resistance to Reform: Status Quo Bias in the Presence of Individual-Specific Uncertainty: Comment (2004)Systemic and Reflexive: Foundations of Cumulative Dis/Advantage and Life-Course Processes (2018)Topic choice contributes to the lower rate of NIH awards to African-American/black scientists (2019)Global citation inequality is on the rise (2021)Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. (1989)Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. (1998)Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. (1998)Implicit? What Do You Mean? A Comprehensive Review of the Delusive Implicitness Construct in Attitude Research (2020)Perceptions of stereotypes applied to women who publicly communicate their STEM work (2020)Patterns of Implicit and Explicit Stereotypes III: Long-Term Change in Gender Stereotypes (2021)Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (1988)Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation (2009)Planting Equity: Using What We Know to Cultivate Growth as a Plant Biology Community (2020)A New Effort to Diversify Faculty: Postdoc-to-Tenure Track Conversion Models (2021)Before the AD: How Departments Generate Hiring Priorities that Support or Avert Faculty Diversity (2021)Sensemaking in Organizations (1996)Handbook of Social Psychology (2004)Getting a Job: Is There a Motherhood Penalty? (2007)Who Gets the Benefit of the Doubt? Performance Evaluations, Medical Errors, and the Production of Gender Inequality in Emergency Medical Education (2020)Hiring women into senior leadership positions is associated with a reduction in gender stereotypes in organizational language (2022)Social Inequality in High Tech: How Gender, Race, and Ethnicity Structure the World's Most Powerful Industry (2023)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2015Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines1,514 cited
  • 2018The Matthew effect in science funding636 cited
  • 2017Gender Stereotypes and Venture Support Decisions: How Governmental Venture Capitalists Socially Construct Entrepreneurs’ Potential254 cited
  • 2017When Two Bodies Are (Not) a Problem: Gender and Relationship Status Discrimination in Academic Hiring236 cited
  • 2019Committees with implicit biases promote fewer women when they do not believe gender bias exists152 cited
  • 2020Inside the Black Box of Organizational Life: The Gendered Language of Performance Assessment144 cited
  • 2018Raising Doubt in Letters of Recommendation for Academia: Gender Differences and Their Impact132 cited
  • 2014Competitive Research Grants and Their Impact on Career Performance112 cited
  • 2020The Facade of Fit in Faculty Search Processes108 cited
  • 2017Systematic Subjectivity: How Subtle Biases Infect the Scholarship Review Process82 cited
  • 2014A Quantitative Linguistic Analysis of National Institutes of Health R01 Application Critiques From Investigators at One Institution80 cited
  • 2012Othering women: fluid images of the ideal academic77 cited
  • 2021Academics as Agentic Superheroes: Female academics’ lack of fit with the agentic stereotype of success limits their career advancement68 cited
  • 2018

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Studying grant decision-making: a linguistic analysis of review reports
61 cited
  • 2019What Words Are Worth: National Science Foundation Grant Abstracts Indicate Award Funding54 cited
  • 2015Presumed incompetent: perceived lack of fit and gender bias in recruitment and selection49 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2022Online panel work through a gender lens: implications of digital peer review meetings9 cited