The effect of social interaction quantity and quality on depressed mood and loneliness: A daily diary study

Adam M. Kuczynski · Max Andrew Halvorson · Lily R. Slater · Jonathan William Kanter

76 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Social and Personal Relationships

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Health disparities and outcomes Attachment and Relationship Dynamics COVID-19 and Mental Health

Abstract

Background Concerns about the possible effects of social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic highlighted several gaps in our knowledge about the association between social interactions and mental health. The current study aimed to characterize the unique effect of social interaction quantity and quality on daily depressed mood and loneliness and to identify the degree to which these processes operate at the within-person and between-person levels of analysis. Methods A community sample of 515 adults was recruited to participate in 75 days of daily surveys. Participants reported on daily feelings of loneliness, depressed mood, social interaction frequency, engagement in vulnerable self-disclosure, and perceived responsiveness. Linear mixed models were used to identify the effect of daily social interaction quantity and quality on loneliness and depressed mood and to characterize the degree to which these effects varied across individuals. Results Social interaction quantity and perceived responsiveness were negatively associated with depressed mood and loneliness at the within-person level of analysis. Perceived responsiveness was also negatively associated with depressed mood and loneliness at both the within-person and between-person levels of analysis. Random slopes analysis revealed substantial heterogeneity in the within-person effects. Limitations The non-experimental design of this study precludes drawing causal conclusions. Furthermore, demographic and/or geographic differences in the observed effects may limit generalization. Conclusions Engaging in more frequent, high-quality interactions may protect against daily depressed mood and loneliness despite one’s average level of these variables. Future research is needed to establish causality and identify the degree to which these findings generalize across samples and time.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 76 citations exist upstream.

References

2001The PHQ-9 2020The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence 2010Social Relationships and Mortality Risk: A Meta-analytic Review 1996UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3): Reliability, Validity, and Factor Structure 2020Mental Health and the Covid-19 Pandemic 2013The Epidemiology of Depression Across Cultures 2017An overview of systematic reviews on the public health consequences of social isolation and loneliness 2012Handbook of research methods for studying daily life

Cited by

2022Daily Social Interactions and Momentary Loneliness: The Role of Trait Loneliness and Neuroticism 2024Understanding loneliness in late life 2023Fluctuations in loneliness due to changes in frequency of social interactions among older adults: a weekly based diary study 2024Insights from neighbourhood walking interviews using the Living Environments and Active Aging Framework (LEAAF) in community-dwelling older adults 2024Shopping centres as third places: Sociodemographic differences in use of shopping centres and non-shopping motivations for visits

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.