this work references cited by second hopReferences
- 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False10,471 cited
- 2009The Psychological Meaning of Words: LIWC and Computerized Text Analysis Methods5,768 cited
- 2005The Language of Evaluation3,345 cited
- 2005Stance and engagement: a model of interaction in academic discourse2,009 cited
- 2004Research Genres1,522 cited
- 2012Scientific Utopia1,301 cited
- 2011Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries1,215 cited
- 2001Evaluation in Text : Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse1,142 cited
- 2013Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review1,126 cited
- 1989Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect1,075 cited
- 1998Persuasion and context: The pragmatics of academic metadiscourse850 cited
- 1969The pollyanna hypothesis548 cited
- 2017Dealing with the positive publication bias: Why you should really publish your negative results516 cited
- 2001Political Correctness426 cited
- 2002A genre analysis of English and Spanish research paper abstracts in experimental social sciences379 cited
Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work