Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Using moral foundations in government communication to reduce vaccine hesitancy

16 references·1 citing·40 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2015Vaccine hesitancy: Definition, scope and determinants5,560 cited
2014Understanding vaccine hesitancy around vaccines and vaccination from a global perspective: A systematic review of published literature, 2007–20122,252 cited
2013Vaccine hesitancy2,178 cited
2014Effective Messages in Vaccine Promotion: A Randomized Trial1,299 cited
2008Vaccination greatly reduces disease, disability, death and inequity worldwide1,241 cited
2015Strategies for addressing vaccine hesitancy – A systematic review1,066 cited
2020Once we have it, will we use it? A European survey on willingness to be vaccinated against COVID-191,012 cited
2003A Review of Cross-Cultural Methodologies for Organizational Research: A Best- Practices Approach820 cited
2018Measuring trust in vaccination: A systematic review786 cited
1934Experimental Social Psychology609 cited
2012Climate change and moral judgement546 cited
2020COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs, health behaviors, and policy support359 cited
2017Association of moral values with vaccine hesitancy355 cited
2017On the benefits of explaining herd immunity in vaccine advocacy325 cited
2021Monetary incentives increase COVID-19 vaccinations

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

306 cited

2017The benefit of the doubt or doubts over benefits? A systematic literature review of perceived risks of vaccines in European populations301 cited

Cited by

2022Moral expressions, sources, and frames: Examining COVID-19 vaccination posts by facebook public pages21 cited