Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

How the Chamber System at the CJEU Undermines the Consistency of the Court’s Application of EU Law

16 references·1 citing·46 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2002Dynamic Ideal Point Estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953–19991,145 cited
1986Unpacking the Court337 cited
2007Comparable Preference Estimates across Time and Institutions for the Court, Congress, and Presidency317 cited
2008The Value of Vagueness: Delegation, Defiance, and Judicial Opinions202 cited
2016Judicial Independence and Political Uncertainty: How the Risk of Override Affects the Court of Justice of the EU195 cited
2007Bargaining and Opinion Assignment on the US Supreme Court190 cited
2011The Political Foundations of Judicial Independence in the European Union188 cited
2012The Supreme Court's Many Median Justices156 cited
2014Scaling Politically Meaningful Dimensions Using Texts and Votes143 cited
2010Locating Supreme Court Opinions in Doctrine Space134 cited
2013The Strategic Nature of Compliance: An Empirical Evaluation of Law Implementation in the Central Monitoring System of the European Union114 cited
2011Who Controls the Content of Supreme Court Opinions?112 cited
2011The New Judicial Politics of Legal Doctrine110 cited
2007Constructing Legal Rules on Appellate Courts107 cited
2011Do ECJ judges all speak with the same voice? Evidence of divergent preferences from the judgments of chambers

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

89 cited

2016Speaking Law to Power: The Strategic Use of Precedent of the Court of Justice of the European Union89 cited

Cited by

2022The timely administration of justice: using computational simulations to evaluate institutional reforms at the CJEU17 cited