SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The case against
16 references·1 citing·36 second hop
The case against (1997)The case againstValidation of bibliometric indicators in the field of mathematics (1996)Validation of bibliometric in…The use of multiple indicators in the assessment of basic research (1996)The use of multiple indicator…Impact factors can mislead (1996)Impact factors can misleadCross-field normalization of scientometric indicators (1996)Cross-field normalization of …Bibliometric performance measures (1996)Bibliometric performance meas…Causal relationship between article citedness and journal impact (1994)Causal relationship between a…Measure for Measure in Science (1993)Measure for Measure in ScienceHow representative is the journal impact factor? (1992)How representative is the jou…Research Papers: Who's Uncited Now? (1991)Research Papers: Who's Uncite…Publishing by—and for?—the Numbers (1990)Publishing by—and for?—the Nu…Problems of citation analysis: A critical review (1989)Problems of citation analysis…Evaluation of some methods for the relative assessment of scientific publications (1986)Evaluation of some methods fo…The application of bibliometric indicators: Important field- and time-dependent factors to be considered (1985)The application of bibliometr…Chance and Consensus in Peer Review (1981)Chance and Consensus in Peer …Structure of the Biomedical Literature (1976)Structure of the Biomedical L…Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Citation Analysis as a Tool i…Rationing in health systems: A critical review (2017)Rationing in health systems: …Networks of Scientific Papers (1965)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior (2008)Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents (1973)Citation rates and journal impact factors are not suitable for evaluation of research (1998)Evaluating "payback" on biomedical research from papers cited in clinical guidelines: applied bibliometric study (2000)The "impact factor" revisited (2005)The frequency distribution of scientific productivity (1926)Citation influence for journal aggregates of scientific publications: Theory, with application to the literature of physics (1976)The skewness of science (1992)Allocative efficiency in public research funding: Can bibliometrics help? (2008)Effectiveness of Journal Ranking Schemes as a Tool for Locating Information (2008)The contribution of universities to innovation and economic development: in what sense a regional problem? (2008)Improving the accuracy of institute for scientific information's journal impact factors (1995)The use and misuse of journal metrics and other citation indicators (2009)University–industry collaboration in Italy: A bibliometric examination (2009)Prestigious Science Journals Struggle to Reach Even Average Reliability (2018)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. (1964)Assessing basic research (1983)Bibliometric Indicators and Analysis of Research Systems (1997)Evaluación de la actividad científica a través de indicadores bibliométricos (1999)The rise and rise of citation analysis (2007)O papel da informetria e da cienciometria e sua perspectiva nacional e internacional (1998)Ways of constructing research questions: gap-spotting or problematization? (2010)From market fixing to market-creating: a new framework for innovation policy (2016)Trends in the Usage of ISI Bibliometric Data: Uses, Abuses, and Implications (2005)Problems of citation analysis: A study of uncited and seldom‐cited influences (2009)The Impact of Article Titles on Citation Hits: An Analysis of General and Specialist Medical Journals (2010)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Open access, readership, citations: a randomized controlled trial of scientific journal publishing (2011)International research collaboration: Novelty, conventionality, and atypicality in knowledge recombination (2019)The Journal “Impact Factor” (1998)Developing Corporate Governance Research through Qualitative Methods: A Review of Previous Studies (2012)From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis (1983)Cumulative Advantage as a Mechanism for Inequality: A Review of Theoretical and Empirical Developments (2006)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1972Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation2,781 cited
  • 1989Problems of citation analysis: A critical review803 cited
  • 1981Chance and Consensus in Peer Review623 cited
  • 1996The use of multiple indicators in the assessment of basic research356 cited
  • 1990Publishing by—and for?—the Numbers246 cited
  • 1976Structure of the Biomedical Literature246 cited
  • 1994Causal relationship between article citedness and journal impact239 cited
  • 1996Bibliometric performance measures234 cited
  • 1996Impact factors can mislead227 cited
  • 1991Research Papers: Who's Uncited Now?219 cited
  • 1986Evaluation of some methods for the relative assessment of scientific publications158 cited
  • 1996Cross-field normalization of scientometric indicators147 cited
  • 1993Measure for Measure in Science125 cited
  • 1985The application of bibliometric indicators: Important field- and time-dependent factors to be considered122 cited
  • 1996Validation of bibliometric indicators in the field of mathematics65 cited
  • 1992How representative is the journal impact factor?

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

62 cited

Cited by

  • 2017Rationing in health systems: A critical review38 cited