The coordination of public sector organizations shifting patterns of public management

Geert Bouckaert, B. Guy Peters, Koen Verhoest

2010-01-01article322 citationsclosed

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

Public Policy and Administration Research Public Administration and Governance Public Administration and Political Analysis

Abstract

PART I: CONCEPTS, THEORIES AND METHODOLOGY The Main Argument: Specialization without Coordination is Centrifugal Coordination: What is it and Why Should we have it? Resources, Mechanisms and Instruments for Coordination How to Map Coordination: Issues of Methodology PART II: SPECIALIZATION AND COORDINATION IN SEVEN COUNTRIES (1980-2005) Coordination in New Zealand Coordination in the United Kingdom Coordination in Sweden Coordination in The Netherlands Coordination in France Coordination in Belgium Coordination in the United States PART III: CROSS-COUNTRY COMPARISON Specialization and Coordination in Seven Countries: Findings and Discussion Appendix A. Comparative tables References End notes

Citations in this library

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 322 citations exist upstream.

References

1978Issue Networks and the Executive Establishment

2004Agencies: How Governments Do Things Through Semi-Autonomous Organizations

Cited by

2017Addressing fragmented government action: coordination, coherence, and integration

2015Pursuing Horizontal Management: The Politics of Public Sector Coordination

2015Policy capacity in public administration

2011Explaining the Innovative Culture and Activities of State Agencies

2012Post-NPM and changing public governance

2021Administrative Traditions

2015Agencification and Public Sector Performance: A systematic comparison in 20 countries

2014State-led metropolitan governance in China: Making integrated city regions