Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Improving Research Clarity and Usefulness with Effect Size Indices as Supplements to Statistical Significance Tests

16 references·16 citing·34 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

1994The earth is round (p < .05).3,999 cited
2011Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association3,167 cited
2010Educational Researcher2,556 cited
1996Practical Significance: A Concept Whose Time Has Come1,774 cited
1931The review of educational research.1,562 cited
1965Handbook of clinical psychology956 cited
1996Statistical significance testing and cumulative knowledge in psychology: Implications for training of researchers.831 cited
1996Statistical significance testing and cumulative knowledge in psychology: Implications for training of researchers.783 cited
1997Bridging the Research-to-Practice Gap384 cited
1964Educational Research: An Introduction325 cited
1993Evaluating Results Using Corrected and Uncorrected Effect Size Estimates265 cited
1997School-to-Work Components That Predict Postschool Success for Students with and without Disabilities233 cited
1996Research news and Comment: AERA Editorial Policies Regarding Statistical Significance Testing: Three Suggested Reforms211 cited
1998Broken Promises: Reading Instruction in the Resource Room196 cited
1982Simplified Determinations of Statistical Power, Magnitude of Effect and Research Sample Sizes

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

135 cited

1986Interpretation of significance levels and effect sizes by psychological researchers.116 cited

Cited by

2002Life on the “Outs”—Examination of the Facility-to-Community Transition of Incarcerated Youth176 cited
2000Reporting Practices and APA Editorial Policies Regarding Statistical Significance and Effect Size126 cited
2001The Effects of Peer-Assisted Literacy Strategies for First-Grade Readers With and Without Additional Computer-Assisted Instruction in Phonological Awareness85 cited
2003Effects and Perceived Consequences of Using Read-Aloud and Teacher-Recommended Testing Accommodations on a Reading Achievement Test72 cited
2003A Comparison of Teacher-Directed versus Peer-Assisted Instruction to Struggling First-Grade Readers61 cited
2020Disentangling the effects of business groups in the innovation-export relationship54 cited
2013The Impact of APA and AERA Guidelines on Effect Size Reporting46 cited
2007Classroom Instructional Ecology and School-Wide Positive Behavior Support44 cited
2007Improvements in interval time tracking and effects on reading achievement42 cited
2004Reporting point and interval estimates of effect-size for planned contrasts: fixed within effect analyses of variance38 cited
2016Failure to Report Effect Sizes27 cited
2016How to Conduct a Good Meta-Analysis in Gifted Education25 cited
2001Statistical Significance, Effect Size, and Replication: What Do the Journals Say?21 cited
2004Two steps forward, one step back:Effect size reporting in gifted education research from 1995–200020 cited
2009Journal Self-Citation V: Coercive Journal Self-Citation – Manipulations to Increase Impact Factors May Do More Harm than Good in the Long Run12 cited
2009Effect Sizes in Gifted Education Research12 cited