Across the boundaries : extrapolation in biology and social science

Daniel P. Steel

208 citations0/0 files stored

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Philosophy and History of Science Philosophy, Science, and History Animal testing and alternatives

Abstract

Steel argues that previous accounts of extrapolation are inadequate and proposes a better approach that is able to answer methodological critiques of extrapolation from animal models to humans. His work develops the thought that knowledge of mechanisms linking cause to effect can serve as a basis for extrapolation.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 208 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2012Reciprocity: Weak or strong? What punishment experiments do (and do not) demonstrate 2011Mechanistic Evidence: Disambiguating the Russo–Williamson Thesis 2015From Libertarian Paternalism to Nudging—and Beyond 2016The Metaphysics of Constitutive Mechanistic Phenomena 2012The evidence that evidence-based medicine omits 2021The advent of fear conditioning as an animal model of post-traumatic stress disorder: Learning from the past to shape the future of PTSD research 2015WHY BEHAVIOURAL POLICY NEEDS MECHANISTIC EVIDENCE 2014Model Organisms are Not (Theoretical) Models

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.