SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Acquiescence in personality questionnaires: Relevance, domain specificity, and stability · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleAcquiescence in personality questionnaires: Relevance, domain specificity, and stability

Daniel Danner2015

Article2015

Acquiescence in personality questionnaires: Relevance, domain specificity, and stability

Daniel Danner · Julian Aichholzer · Beatrice Rammstedt

121 citations·0/0 files stored·Journal of Research in Personality

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Psychometric Methodologies and Testing Personality Traits and Psychology Survey Methodology and Nonresponse

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 121 citations exist upstream.

References

2002Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance 1999The Big Five Trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives.2008Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research 1996Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications.2006Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German 1997Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications 1991Measurement and Control of Response Bias 1991Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes

Cited by

2019Das Big Five Inventar 2 2018A New Measure of Life Satisfaction: The Riverside Life Satisfaction Scale 2016Acquiescence response styles: A multilevel model explaining individual-level and country-level differences 2023Let the algorithm speak: How to use neural networks for automatic item generation in psychological scale development.2018Optimizing the length, width, and balance of a personality scale: How do internal characteristics affect external validity?

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2018A New Model for Acquiescence at the Interface of Psychometrics and Cognitive Psychologyarticle · 9 shared references 2013The impact of acquiescence on the evaluation of personality structure.article · 7 shared references 2004Towards Understanding Assessments of the Big Five: Multitrait‐Multimethod Analyses of Convergent and Discriminant Validity Across Measurement Occasion and Type of Observerarticle · 6 shared references 2009The measurement equivalence of Big-Five factor markers for persons with different levels of educationarticle · 6 shared references 2008The Stability of Individual Response Stylespreprint · 6 shared references 2012Correcting Big Five Personality Measurements for Acquiescence: An 18–Country Cross–Cultural Studyarticle · 6 shared references

Details

Year2015

Typearticle

Published2015-05-29

VenueJournal of Research in Personality

ISSN-L0092-6566

Languageen

Citations121

Files0 public / 0

ShelfPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Identifiers

doi10.1016/j.jrp.2015.05.004

openalex_workW384900141

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.

2018A New Model for Acquiescence at the Interface of Psychometrics and Cognitive Psychology

2020Short Version of Self-Assessment Scale of Job Performance

2018Relationships between epistemic beliefs and achievement goals: developmental trends over grades 5–11