The impact of acquiescence on the evaluation of personality structure.

Beatrice Rammstedt · Richard F. Farmer

124 citations0/0 files storedPsychological Assessment

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Psychometric Methodologies and Testing Personality Traits and Psychology Psychological Testing and Assessment

Abstract

Acquiescence, or the tendency to respond to descriptions of conceptually distinct personality attributes with agreement/affirmation (acceptance acquiescence) or disagreement/opposition (counter-acquiescence), has been widely recognized as a source of bias that can substantially alter interitem correlations within scales. Acquiescence is also known to operate differently among some groups of persons; it is, for example, more pronounced among individuals with less formal education. Consequently, the biasing effects of acquiescence are of particular concern when the dimensionality underlying the item set of a measure is examined with representative samples comprised of persons with varying levels of educational attainment and evaluated with correlation-based statistical methods such as factor analysis. In the present study, we extended our earlier research by investigating the biasing effect of acquiescence on personality factor structures derived from the full-scale version of the Big Five Inventory (BFI) when administered to a large sample (N = 1,427) selected to be representative of Germany's adult population. Consistent with previous findings based on a short-scale version of the BFI, factor analyses of the unadjusted BFI item set failed to replicate the expected Big Five-factor structure in the low/medium and high educational groups, with distortions in factor structure more pronounced in the former group. Once acquiescence was controlled in the item responses for both groups, however, the obtained factor structures were consistent with the Big Five framework. The implications of acquiescence on the evaluation of the factor structure of personality inventories and for the validity of personality assessments are discussed.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 124 citations exist upstream.

References

1999The Big Five Trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives.2006Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German 2005The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures 1999A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models 1995Psychological Assessment Resources 1997Personality Psychology in Europe 1989MMPI-2 : Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 : manual for administration and scoring 2010NEO inventories for the NEO Personality Inventory-3 (NEO-PI-3), NEO Five-Factor Inventory-3 (NEO-FFI-3), NEO Personality Inventory-Revised (NEO PI-R) : professional manual

Cited by

2019A New Approach to the Study of Tolerance: Conceptualizing and Measuring Acceptance, Respect, and Appreciation of Difference 2018Do self-compassion and self-coldness distinctly relate to distress and well-being? A theoretical model of self-relating.2015Acquiescence in personality questionnaires: Relevance, domain specificity, and stability 2017Cognitive Abilities Explain Wording Effects in the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.