SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The impact of acquiescence on the evaluation of personality structure.
16 references·16 citing·28 second hopsampled
The impact of acquiescence on the evaluation of personality structure. (2013)The impact of acquiescence on the evaluat…NEO inventories for the NEO Personality Inventory-3 (NEO-PI-3), NEO Five-Factor Inventory-3 (NEO-FFI-3), NEO Personality Inventory-Revised (NEO PI-R) : professional manual (2010)NEO inventories for the NEO P…Tucker's Congruence Coefficient as a Meaningful Index of Factor Similarity (2006)Tucker's Congruence Coefficie…Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German (2006)Measuring personality in one …The NEO–PI–3: A More Readable Revised NEO Personality Inventory (2005)The NEO–PI–3: A More Readable…The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures (2005)The international personality…The Big Five Trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. (1999)The Big Five Trait taxonomy: …Handbook of personality: Theory and research, 2nd ed. (1999)Handbook of personality: Theo…A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models (1999)A broad-bandwidth, public dom…Los Cinco Grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: Multitrait-multimethod analyses of the Big Five in Spanish and English. (1998)Los Cinco Grandes across cult…Personality Psychology in Europe (1997)Personality Psychology in Eur…Role of social desirability in personality testing for personnel selection: The red herring. (1996)Role of social desirability i…Psychological Assessment Resources (1995)Psychological Assessment Reso…MMPI-2 : Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 : manual for administration and scoring (1989)MMPI-2 : Minnesota Multiphasi…Objective Tests as Instruments of Psychological Theory (1957)Objective Tests as Instrument…Further Evidence on Response Sets and Test Design (1950)Further Evidence on Response …Response Sets and Test Validity (1946)Response Sets and Test Validi…Do Links Between Personality and Life Outcomes Generalize? Testing the Robustness of Trait–Outcome Associations Across Gender, Age, Ethnicity, and Analytic Approaches (2020)Do Links Between Personality …Though Forced, Still Valid: Psychometric Equivalence of Forced-Choice and Single-Statement Measures (2019)Though Forced, Still Valid: P…Measurement Invariance and Sex and Age Differences of the Big Five Inventory–2: Evidence From the Russian Version (2019)Measurement Invariance and Se…A New Approach to the Study of Tolerance: Conceptualizing and Measuring Acceptance, Respect, and Appreciation of Difference (2019)A New Approach to the Study o…The Relation of Personality and Intelligence—What Can the Brunswik Symmetry Principle Tell Us? (2018)The Relation of Personality a…Optimizing the length, width, and balance of a personality scale: How do internal characteristics affect external validity? (2018)Optimizing the length, width,…Do self-compassion and self-coldness distinctly relate to distress and well-being? A theoretical model of self-relating. (2018)Do self-compassion and self-c…Hierarchical structure of emotional disorders: From individual symptoms to the spectrum. (2017)Hierarchical structure of emo…Cognitive Abilities Explain Wording Effects in the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (2017)Cognitive Abilities Explain W…How response bias affects the factorial structure of personality self-reports (2016)How response bias affects the…Die Facettenstruktur des Big Five Inventory (BFI) (2016)Die Facettenstruktur des Big …Acquiescence response styles: A multilevel model explaining individual-level and country-level differences (2016)Acquiescence response styles:…Cognitive ability, acquiescence, and the structure of personality in a sample of older adults. (2015)Cognitive ability, acquiescen…Acquiescence in personality questionnaires: Relevance, domain specificity, and stability (2015)Acquiescence in personality q…The structure and short-term stability of the emotional disorders: a dimensional approach (2014)The structure and short-term …Random intercept EFA of personality scales (2014)Random intercept EFA of perso…An alternative "description of personality": The Big-Five factor structure. (1990)THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META‐ANALYSIS (1991)An Introduction to the Five‐Factor Model and Its Applications (1992)Handbook of Positive Psychology (2001)Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. (2003)EQS : structural equations program manual (1989)Comparative fit indexes in structural models. (1990)Should We Trust Web-Based Studies? A Comparative Analysis of Six Preconceptions About Internet Questionnaires. (2004)qgraph : Network Visualizations of Relationships in Psychometric Data (2012)Measurement and Control of Response Bias (1991)Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes (1991)Differences Between Tight and Loose Cultures: A 33-Nation Study (2011)Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior (2013)The next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power. (2016)The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. (1992)A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains (2003)Why do people use Facebook? (2011)Public Opinion on Automated Driving: Results of an International Questionnaire Among 5,000 Respondents (2014)Psychological characteristics associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and resistance in Ireland and the United Kingdom (2021)Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. (1994)Identifying careless responses in survey data. (2012)The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A dimensional alternative to traditional nosologies. (2017)Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review. (2002)Psychological correlates of university students' academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. (2012)The Recovery Experience Questionnaire: Development and validation of a measure for assessing recuperation and unwinding from work. (2007)Gratitude and well-being: A review and theoretical integration (2010)Linking “big” personality traits to anxiety, depressive, and substance use disorders: A meta-analysis. (2010)Dimensionalizing Cultures: The Hofstede Model in Context (2011)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 1999The Big Five Trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives.7,993 cited
  • 2006Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German4,236 cited
  • 2005The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures3,178 cited
  • 1999A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models3,150 cited
  • 1995Psychological Assessment Resources3,123 cited
  • 1997Personality Psychology in Europe2,461 cited
  • 1989MMPI-2 : Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 : manual for administration and scoring2,450 cited
  • 2010NEO inventories for the NEO Personality Inventory-3 (NEO-PI-3), NEO Five-Factor Inventory-3 (NEO-FFI-3), NEO Personality Inventory-Revised (NEO PI-R) : professional manual2,339 cited
  • 1998Los Cinco Grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: Multitrait-multimethod analyses of the Big Five in Spanish and English.1,995 cited
  • 1999Handbook of personality: Theory and research, 2nd ed.1,526 cited
  • 1957Objective Tests as Instruments of Psychological Theory1,474 cited
  • 2006Tucker's Congruence Coefficient as a Meaningful Index of Factor Similarity1,123 cited
  • 1996Role of social desirability in personality testing for personnel selection: The red herring.924 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

1946
Response Sets and Test Validity
898 cited
  • 1950Further Evidence on Response Sets and Test Design734 cited
  • 2005The NEO–PI–3: A More Readable Revised NEO Personality Inventory701 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2019A New Approach to the Study of Tolerance: Conceptualizing and Measuring Acceptance, Respect, and Appreciation of Difference140 cited
    • 2018Do self-compassion and self-coldness distinctly relate to distress and well-being? A theoretical model of self-relating.125 cited
    • 2015Acquiescence in personality questionnaires: Relevance, domain specificity, and stability121 cited
    • 2017Cognitive Abilities Explain Wording Effects in the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale105 cited
    • 2018The Relation of Personality and Intelligence—What Can the Brunswik Symmetry Principle Tell Us?105 cited
    • 2014Random intercept EFA of personality scales101 cited
    • 2015Cognitive ability, acquiescence, and the structure of personality in a sample of older adults.97 cited
    • 2017Hierarchical structure of emotional disorders: From individual symptoms to the spectrum.96 cited
    • 2016Die Facettenstruktur des Big Five Inventory (BFI)94 cited
    • 2020Do Links Between Personality and Life Outcomes Generalize? Testing the Robustness of Trait–Outcome Associations Across Gender, Age, Ethnicity, and Analytic Approaches90 cited
    • 2016Acquiescence response styles: A multilevel model explaining individual-level and country-level differences85 cited
    • 2014The structure and short-term stability of the emotional disorders: a dimensional approach77 cited
    • 2016How response bias affects the factorial structure of personality self-reports66 cited
    • 2019Measurement Invariance and Sex and Age Differences of the Big Five Inventory–2: Evidence From the Russian Version60 cited
    • 2018Optimizing the length, width, and balance of a personality scale: How do internal characteristics affect external validity?59 cited
    • 2019Though Forced, Still Valid: Psychometric Equivalence of Forced-Choice and Single-Statement Measures52 cited