SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The contexts of science journalism in the Brazilian Federal Institutes: characterizing realities and possibilities of communication products
16 references·0 citing·50 second hop
The contexts of science journalism in the Brazilian Federal Institutes: characterizing realities and possibilities of communication products (2022)The contexts of science journalism in the…Scientists’ incentives and attitudes toward public communication (2020)Scientists’ incentives and at…Saw It on Facebook: The Role of Social Media in Facilitating Science Issue Awareness (2020)Saw It on Facebook: The Role …Public communication by research institutes compared across countries and sciences: Building capacity for engagement or competing for visibility? (2020)Public communication by resea…Exploring the intersections: researchers and communication professionals' perspectives on the organizational role of science communication (2020)Exploring the intersections: …Communicating science in organizational contexts: toward an “organizational turn” in science communication research (2020)Communicating science in orga…Science Journalism (2019)Science JournalismComparing science communication theory with practice: An assessment and critique using Australian data (2019)Comparing science communicati…Science Communication Is Culture: Foregrounding Ritual in the Public Communication of Science (2018)Science Communication Is Cult…Scientists’ views about communication objectives (2017)Scientists’ views about commu…Routledge Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology (2014)Routledge Handbook of Public …Public communication of science 2.0 (2014)Public communication of scien…Organizational Influence on Scientists’ Efforts to Go Public (2013)Organizational Influence on S…Science communication reconsidered (2009)Science communication reconsi…Handbook of public communication of science and technology (2009)Handbook of public communicat…Selection and use of content experts for instrument development (1997)Selection and use of content …Writing science news for the mass media (1973)Writing science news for the …Technologies of Humility: Citizen Participation in Governing Science (2003)Technologies of Humility: Citizen Participation in Governing Science (2005)The “Nasty Effect:” Online Incivility and Risk Perceptions of Emerging Technologies (2013)Scientists' views about communication training (2015)Using Expert Sources to Correct Health Misinformation in Social Media (2017)Fostering public trust in science: The role of social media (2019)An Economic Theory of Democracy. (1958)See-through Science: Why public engagement needs to move upstream (2004)Science Communication to the General Public: Why We Need to Teach Undergraduate and Graduate Students this Skill as Part of Their Formal Scientific Training. (2013)Climate journalism in a changing media ecosystem: Assessing the production of climate change‐related news around the world (2020)Risk Perception: Reflections on 40 Years of Research (2020)The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields (1983)Creating entrepreneurial universities : organizational pathways of transformation (1998)The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields (2004)What do scientists think about the public and does it matter to their online engagement? (2014)Mobilisation for public engagement: Benchmarking the practices of research institutes (2016)The theory of planned behavior (1991)An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust: Past, Present, and Future (2007)Predicting and Changing Behavior: The Reasoned Action Approach (2009)Using selfies to challenge public stereotypes of scientists (2019)Vaccination Discussion among Parents on Social Media: A Content Analysis of Comments on Parenting Blogs (2020)A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms (2005)What's next for science communication? Promising directions and lingering distractions (2009)Reducing Confusion about Grounded Theory and Qualitative Content Analysis: Similarities and Differences (2014)Exploring the invisible college of citizen science: questions, methods and contributions (2021)Evaluationsmethoden der Wissenschaftskommunikation (2023)Inclusive Science Communication training for first-year STEM students promotes their identity and self-efficacy as scientists and science communicators (2023)Scientists’ Prioritization of Communication Objectives for Public Engagement (2016)Understanding Scientists’ Willingness to Engage (2018)How significant are the public dimensions of faculty work in review, promotion and tenure documents? (2019)Public engagement: Faculty lived experiences and perspectives underscore barriers and a changing culture in academia (2022)Universities claim to value community-engaged scholarship: So why do they discourage it? (2022)Undergraduate STEM Students’ Science Communication Skills, Science Identity, and Science Self-Efficacy Influence Their Motivations and Behaviors in STEM Community Engagement (2023)Is guided self-help as effective as face-to-face psychotherapy for depression and anxiety disorders? A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative outcome studies (2010)Hard and soft news: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings (2011)Social Knowledge in the Making (2011)The Need for Knowledge-Based Journalism in Politicized Science Debates (2015)Science stories as culture: experience, identity, narrative and emotion in public communication of science (2019)Rethinking science communication as the social conversation around science (2021)Principles of topological psychology. (1936)Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. (1982)E-mail Survey Response Rates: A Review (2006)Public communication at research universities: Moving towards (de)centralised communication of science? (2021)Public Perception of COVID-19 Vaccination in Italy: The Role of Trust and Experts’ Communication (2022)The Communication Function of Universities: Is There a Place for Science Communication? (2023)Defining and Measuring Servant Leadership Behaviour in Organizations (2008)Principles and methods of validity and reliability testing of questionnaires used in social and health science researches (2015)INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT (2023)Gap between science and media revisited: Scientists as public communicators (2013)Public Communication of Science in Blogs (2013)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1997Selection and use of content experts for instrument development1,169 cited
  • 2009Science communication reconsidered478 cited
  • 2014Routledge Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology270 cited
  • 2020Scientists’ incentives and attitudes toward public communication158 cited
  • 2017Scientists’ views about communication objectives155 cited
  • 2019Comparing science communication theory with practice: An assessment and critique using Australian data138 cited
  • 2013Organizational Influence on Scientists’ Efforts to Go Public131 cited
  • 2009Handbook of public communication of science and technology114 cited
  • 2014Public communication of science 2.0110 cited
  • 2020Public communication by research institutes compared across countries and sciences: Building capacity for engagement or competing for visibility?96 cited
  • 2020Communicating science in organizational contexts: toward an “organizational turn” in science communication research60 cited
  • 2020Exploring the intersections: researchers and communication professionals' perspectives on the organizational role of science communication37 cited
  • 2020Saw It on Facebook: The Role of Social Media in Facilitating Science Issue Awareness35 cited
  • 2019Science Journalism35 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 1973Writing science news for the mass media21 cited
  • 2018Science Communication Is Culture: Foregrounding Ritual in the Public Communication of Science21 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.