SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Academics’ Opinions Regarding the Quality of Scientific Publications and Their Quality Problems
16 references·0 citing·50 second hop
Academics’ Opinions Regarding the Quality of Scientific Publications and Their Quality Problems (2021)Academics’ Opinions Regarding the Quality…How to Write a Good Scientific Paper (2018)How to Write a Good Scientifi…The European research elite: a cross-national study of highly productive academics in 11 countries (2015)The European research elite: …Defining and assessing research quality in a transdisciplinary context (2015)Defining and assessing resear…Plagiarism in Scientific Research and Publications and How to Prevent It (2014)Plagiarism in Scientific Rese…Publish or perish: academic life as management faculty live it (2011)Publish or perish: academic l…The Challenge of Academic Publishing: A Hong Kong Perspective (2005)The Challenge of Academic Pub…Problems with Publishing: Existing State and Solutions (2005)Problems with Publishing: Exi…The Top 10 Reasons Why Manuscripts Are Not Accepted for Publication (2004)The Top 10 Reasons Why Manusc…Study design, originality and overall consistency influence acceptance or rejection of manuscripts submitted to the Journal (2004)Study design, originality and…Quality control in academic publishing: challenges in the age of cyberscience (2004)Quality control in academic p…THE CRISIS OF RESEARCH AND ACADEMIC PUBLISHING IN NIGERIAN UNIVERSITIES: THE TWENTIETH CENTURY AND BEYOND (2002)THE CRISIS OF RESEARCH AND AC…Systems to rate the strength of scientific evidence. (2002)Systems to rate the strength …Quality Indicators in Academic Publishing (1994)Quality Indicators in Academi…Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (1994)Qualitative Data Analysis: An…The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)The Structure of Scientific R…THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS (1963)THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC R…Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Cultural Competence (2005)Bulimia nervosa treatment: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (2007)Using qualitative metasummary to synthesize qualitative and quantitative descriptive findings (2007)Reframing Organizations: Artistry, Choice, and Leadership. (1994)A Meta-Analysis of Response Rates in Web- or Internet-Based Surveys (2000)Mail and internet surveys : the tailored design method (2007)Intended and unintended consequences of a publish‐or‐perish culture: A worldwide survey (2012)Misconduct Policies, Academic Culture and Career Stage, Not Gender or Pressures to Publish, Affect Scientific Integrity (2015)Researchers’ Individual Publication Rate Has Not Increased in a Century (2016)Self-citation corrections for the Hirsch index (2007)How to Search, Write, Prepare and Publish the Scientific Papers in the Biomedical Journals (2011)Plagiarism in Scientific Publishing (2012)Research misconduct in health and life sciences research: A systematic review of retracted literature from Brazilian institutions (2019)Turnitin: Is it a text matching or plagiarism detection tool? (2019)Scientific Publishing in Biomedicine: A Brief History of Scientific Journals (2022)The Academic Profession: An International Perspective (1995)“Nondiscursive” Requirements in Academic Publishing, Material Resources of Periphery Scholars, and the Politics of Knowledge Production (1996)Problems in writing for scholarly publication in English: The case of Hong Kong (1999)A Case Study of Swedish Scholars’ Experiences With and Perceptions of the Use of English in Academic Publishing (2012)Publish (in international indexed journals) or perish: Neoliberal ideology in a Korean university (2013)‘This game is not easy to play’: a narrative inquiry into a novice EFL teacher educator’s research and publishing experiences (2016)The New production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies (1995)Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counseling psychology. (2005)Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges (2012)Assessing the impact of transdisciplinary research: The usefulness of relevance, credibility, and legitimacy for understanding the link between process and impact (2018)Societal effects of transdisciplinary sustainability research—How can they be strengthened during the research process? (2019)Transdisciplinarity: Synthesis towards a modular approach (2021)Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. A meta-analysis (1994)Unpublished Research From a Medical Specialty Meeting (1998)Accuracy of Data in Abstracts of Published Research Articles (1999)Why Referees Reject Manuscripts (2007)How to write a scientific article. (2012)Writing a scientific article: A step-by-step guide for beginners (2015)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)Research Methods in Education (2002)Research Methods in Education (2007)Quantity and/or Quality? The Importance of Publishing Many Papers (2016)Research status of shale gas: A review (2017)Internationalists and locals: international research collaboration in a resource-poor system (2020)Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis (2005)Using thematic analysis in psychology (2006)The qualitative content analysis process (2008)Technological paradigms and technological trajectories (1982)Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria (1990)Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies (2015)Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems (1995)Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage (1998)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1994Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook48,401 cited
  • 1963The Structure of Scientific Revolutions21,164 cited
  • 1963THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS8,424 cited
  • 2002Systems to rate the strength of scientific evidence.880 cited
  • 2011Publish or perish: academic life as management faculty live it328 cited
  • 2015Defining and assessing research quality in a transdisciplinary context274 cited
  • 2015The European research elite: a cross-national study of highly productive academics in 11 countries178 cited
  • 2004The Top 10 Reasons Why Manuscripts Are Not Accepted for Publication162 cited
  • 2014Plagiarism in Scientific Research and Publications and How to Prevent It100 cited
  • 2005The Challenge of Academic Publishing: A Hong Kong Perspective60 cited
  • 2004Study design, originality and overall consistency influence acceptance or rejection of manuscripts submitted to the Journal57 cited
  • 2018How to Write a Good Scientific Paper51 cited
  • 1994Quality Indicators in Academic Publishing34 cited
  • 2002THE CRISIS OF RESEARCH AND ACADEMIC PUBLISHING IN NIGERIAN UNIVERSITIES: THE TWENTIETH CENTURY AND BEYOND26 cited
  • 2005Problems with Publishing: Existing State and Solutions

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

24 cited
  • 2004Quality control in academic publishing: challenges in the age of cyberscience23 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.