SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Cryptocurrencies and future financial crime
16 references·0 citing·31 second hopsampled
Cryptocurrencies and future financial crime (2022)Cryptocurrencies and future financial cri…The Rise in Popularity of Cryptocurrency and Associated Criminal Activity (2019)The Rise in Popularity of Cry…To the moon: defining and detecting cryptocurrency pump-and-dumps (2018)To the moon: defining and det…Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)Systematic review or scoping …Price manipulation in the Bitcoin ecosystem (2018)Price manipulation in the Bit…Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories (2018)Google Scholar, Web of Scienc…Google Scholar to overshadow them all? Comparing the sizes of 12 academic search engines and bibliographic databases (2018)Google Scholar to overshadow …The ICO Gold Rush: It's a Scam, It's a Bubble, It's a Super Challenge for Regulators (2017)The ICO Gold Rush: It's a Sca…Understanding scoping reviews (2016)Understanding scoping reviewsThere’s No Free Lunch, Even Using Bitcoin: Tracking the Popularity and Profits of Virtual Currency Scams (2015)There’s No Free Lunch, Even U…Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews (2015)Guidance for conducting syste…Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews (2014)Synthesizing information syst…A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency (2014)A scoping review of scoping r…Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)Scoping studies: advancing th…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Scoping studies: towards a me…User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models (1989)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review (2017)The Rise of Motivational Information Systems: A Review of Gamification Research (2017)Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda (2019)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2020)A Comparison of Results of Meta-analyses of Randomized Control Trials and Recommendations of Clinical Experts (1992)Qualitative research in health care: Analysing qualitative data (2000)Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research (2002)Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis (2005)A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes (1976)Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison (2015)The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources (2019)The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis (2021)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases (2013)Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references (2015)Software tools for conducting bibliometric analysis in science: An up-to-date review (2020)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews (2022)New Era of Artificial Intelligence in Education: Towards a Sustainable Multifaceted Revolution (2023)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement84,364 cited
  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement65,829 cited
  • 2005Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework37,853 cited
  • 2010Scoping studies: advancing the methodology15,768 cited
  • 2018Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach11,859 cited
  • 2015Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews7,574 cited
  • 2014A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency3,124 cited
  • 2018Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories2,343 cited
  • 2014Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews1,987 cited
  • 2018Google Scholar to overshadow them all? Comparing the sizes of 12 academic search engines and bibliographic databases810 cited
  • 2018Price manipulation in the Bitcoin ecosystem783 cited
  • 2016Understanding scoping reviews767 cited
  • 2019The Rise in Popularity of Cryptocurrency and Associated Criminal Activity255 cited
  • 2017The ICO Gold Rush: It's a Scam, It's a Bubble, It's a Super Challenge for Regulators

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

250 cited
  • 2015There’s No Free Lunch, Even Using Bitcoin: Tracking the Popularity and Profits of Virtual Currency Scams249 cited
  • 2018To the moon: defining and detecting cryptocurrency pump-and-dumps192 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.