SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The Value of Data and Other Non-traditional Scholarly Outputs in Academic Review, Promotion, and Tenure in Canada and the United States
16 references·4 citing·37 second hop
The Value of Data and Other Non-traditional Scholarly Outputs in Academic Review, Promotion, and Tenure in Canada and the United States (2022)The Value of Data and Other Non-tradition…Why we publish where we do: Faculty publishing values and their relationship to review, promotion and tenure expectations (2020)Why we publish where we do: F…Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations (2019)Use of the Journal Impact Fac…How significant are the public dimensions of faculty work in review, promotion and tenure documents? (2019)How significant are the publi…The evaluation of scholarship in academic promotion and tenure processes: Past, present, and future (2018)The evaluation of scholarship…Prestigious Science Journals Struggle to Reach Even Average Reliability (2018)Prestigious Science Journals …More Than Likes and Tweets: Creating Social Media Portfolios for Academic Promotion and Tenure (2017)More Than Likes and Tweets: C…How open science helps researchers succeed (2016)How open science helps resear…1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility (2016)1,500 scientists lift the lid…Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Man…The National Institutes of Health's Big Data to Knowledge (BD2K) initiative: capitalizing on biomedical big data (2014)The National Institutes of He…The big challenges of big data (2013)The big challenges of big dataLearning from the Experience of Others: The Evolution of Faculty Tenure and Promotion Rules in Comprehensive Institutions (2009)Learning from the Experience …Defining and Rewarding Academic Citizenship: The implications for university promotions policy (2007)Defining and Rewarding Academ…Research Standards for Promotion and Tenure in Information Systems1 (2006)Research Standards for Promot…Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques (1993)Basics of Qualitative Researc…The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching (1909)The Carnegie Foundation for t…The publish or perish, publish and perish, publish then perish, and now retract and perish cultures in academia (2025)The publish or perish, publis…Understanding the social and political dimensions of research(er) assessment: evaluative flexibility and hidden criteria in promotion processes at research institutes (2024)Understanding the social and …Open Access, Scholarly Communication, and Open Science in Psychology: An Overview for Researchers (2024)Open Access, Scholarly Commun…Value dissonance in research(er) assessment: individual and perceived institutional priorities in review, promotion, and tenure (2023)Value dissonance in research(…Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? (2015)Science Mapping: A Systematic Review of the Literature (2017)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact (2001)Nipype: A Flexible, Lightweight and Extensible Neuroimaging Data Processing Framework in Python (2011)Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)Open Science now: A systematic literature review for an integrated definition (2018)Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond (2019)The Scholarship of Engagement (1996)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Assessing the effect of article processing charges on the geographic diversity of authors using Elsevier’s “Mirror Journal” system (2021)Dynamics of cumulative advantage and threats to equity in open science: a scoping review (2022)Global self-evaluation as determined by the desirability and controllability of trait adjectives. (1985)Evaluations of Self and Others: Self-Enhancement Biases in Social Judgments (1986)The theory of planned behavior (1991)How the publish-or-perish principle divides a science: the case of economists (2020)Open is not forever: A study of vanished open access journals (2021)Brokering Community–University Engagement (2008)Development and validation of the Online Student Connectedness Survey (OSCS) (2012)Higher education teachers’ professional learning: Process and outcome (2015)Toward a Literature-Driven Definition of Big Data in Healthcare (2015)Scaling Up Scientific Discovery in Sleep Medicine: The National Sleep Research Resource (2016)Towards reproducible computational drug discovery (2020)Visualizing and interacting with large-volume biodiversity data using client–server web-mapping applications: The design and implementation of antmaps.org (2016)Next-Generation Big Data Analytics: State of the Art, Challenges, and Future Research Topics (2017)From conventional group decision making to large-scale group decision making: What are the challenges and how to meet them in big data era? A state-of-the-art survey (2019)Narrative configuration in qualitative analysis (1995)Critical Race Methodology: Counter-Storytelling as an Analytical Framework for Education Research (2002)Understanding Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research (2015)A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)Bioconda: sustainable and comprehensive software distribution for the life sciences (2018)The nf-core framework for community-curated bioinformatics pipelines (2020)Academic criteria for promotion and tenure in biomedical sciences faculties: cross sectional analysis of international sample of universities (2020)Gendered citation practices in the field of communication (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1993Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques17,576 cited
  • 20161,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility4,200 cited
  • 2015Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics2,816 cited
  • 2013The big challenges of big data1,232 cited
  • 2016How open science helps researchers succeed790 cited
  • 1909The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching437 cited
  • 2019Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations357 cited
  • 2018The evaluation of scholarship in academic promotion and tenure processes: Past, present, and future343 cited
  • 2014The National Institutes of Health's Big Data to Knowledge (BD2K) initiative: capitalizing on biomedical big data276 cited
  • 2020Why we publish where we do: Faculty publishing values and their relationship to review, promotion and tenure expectations243 cited
  • 2018Prestigious Science Journals Struggle to Reach Even Average Reliability213 cited
  • 2019How significant are the public dimensions of faculty work in review, promotion and tenure documents?190 cited
  • 2006Research Standards for Promotion and Tenure in Information Systems1190 cited
  • 2009Learning from the Experience of Others: The Evolution of Faculty Tenure and Promotion Rules in Comprehensive Institutions

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

190 cited
  • 2017More Than Likes and Tweets: Creating Social Media Portfolios for Academic Promotion and Tenure189 cited
  • 2007Defining and Rewarding Academic Citizenship: The implications for university promotions policy182 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2025The publish or perish, publish and perish, publish then perish, and now retract and perish cultures in academia15 cited
    • 2024Open Access, Scholarly Communication, and Open Science in Psychology: An Overview for Researchers14 cited
    • 2024Understanding the social and political dimensions of research(er) assessment: evaluative flexibility and hidden criteria in promotion processes at research institutes12 cited
    • 2023Value dissonance in research(er) assessment: individual and perceived institutional priorities in review, promotion, and tenure12 cited